oru.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 4 of 4
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Horn, Henrik
    et al.
    Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, United Kingdom; Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden.
    Johannesson, Louise
    Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden.
    Mavroidis, Petros C.
    Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, United Kingdom; Columbia Law School, New York, United States; Faculty of Law, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
    The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995-2010: Some Descriptive Statistics2011In: Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011-6702, E-ISSN 2210-2795, Vol. 45, no 6, p. 1107-1138Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the busiest state to state court nowadays. It is a rarity in international relations since it includes compulsory third-party adjudication and a permanent second instance court. This paper aims to shed light on the actual use of the system by WTO Members. We divide WTO Members into five distinct groups and evaluate their participation in terms of which agreements they invoke as legal benchmark to challenge practices by other WTO Members, the identity of panelists chosen, their percentage of wins and defeats, etc. The time span for our statistical observations extends from the advent of the WTO 1995 to end of 2010.

  • 2.
    Johannesson, Louise
    et al.
    IFN, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Mavroidis, Petros C.
    Columbia & Neuchatel Orebro Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.;IFN Inst Ind Econ, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity of the WTO Judges2015In: Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011-6702, E-ISSN 2210-2795, Vol. 49, no 4, p. 685-698Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    World Trade Organization (WTO) judges are proposed by the WTO Secretariat and elected to act as 'judges' if either approved by the parties to a dispute, or, by the WTO Director-General in case no agreement between the parties has been possible. They are typically 'Geneva crowd', that is, they are either current or former delegates representing their country before the WTO. This observation holds for both first as well as second instance WTO judges (e.g., Panellists and members of the Appellate Body). In that, the WTO evidences an attitude strikingly similar to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Whereas the legal regime has been heavily 'legalized', the people called to enforce it remain the same.

  • 3.
    Johannesson, Louise
    et al.
    Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business. Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden.
    Mavroidis, Petros C.
    Columbia Law School, New York City, US; University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
    The WTO dispute settlement system 1995-2016: A data set and its descriptive statistics2017In: Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011-6702, E-ISSN 2210-2795, Vol. 51, no 3, p. 357-408Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article, we provide some descriptive statistics of the first twenty years of the WTO (World Trade Organization) dispute settlement., that we have extracted from the data set that we have put together, and made publicly available (http://globalgovernancepro gramme.eui.eu/wto-case-law-project/). The statistical information that we present here is divided into three thematic units: the statutory and de facto duration of each stage of the process, paying particular attention to the eventual conclusion of litigation; the identity and participation in the process of the various institutional players, that is, not only complainants and defendants, but also third parties, as well as the WTO judges (panellists and Appellate Body members); and, finally, information regarding the subjectmatter of various disputes, regarding the frequency with which claims regarding consistency of measures with the covered agreements (but also, at a more disaggregate level, e.g. specific provisions) have been raised. We call our work ‘descriptive statistics’, because, in an effort to provide raw material that will help researchers to conduct their research as they see fit, we have consciously refrained from systematically interpreting the data that we have assembled.

  • 4.
    Lodefalk, Magnus
    et al.
    Örebro University, Department of Business, Economics, Statistics and Informatics.
    Storey, Mark
    Naturvårdsverket.
    Climate measures and WTO rules on subsidies2005In: Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011-6702, E-ISSN 2210-2795, Vol. 39, no 1, p. 23-44Article in journal (Refereed)
1 - 4 of 4
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf