oru.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 37 of 37
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    García-Andrade, Adriana
    et al.
    Department of Sociology, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), México.
    Gunnarsson, LenaDepartment of Gender Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Jonasdottir, Anna G.Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Feminism and the Power of Love: Interdisciplinary Interventions2018Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 2.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    A defence of the category 'women'2011In: Feminist Theory, ISSN 1464-7001, E-ISSN 1741-2773, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 23-37Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Against influential strands of feminist theory, I argue that there is nothing essentialist or homogenising about the category ‘women’. I show that both intersectional claims that it is impossible to separate out the ‘woman part’ of women, and deconstructionist contentions that the category ‘women’ is a fiction, rest on untenable meta-theoretical assumptions. I posit that a more fruitful way of approaching this disputed category is to treat it as an abstraction. Drawing on the philosophical framework of critical realism I elucidate the nature of the vital and inevitable process of abstraction, as a means of finding a way out of the theoretical and methodological impasse that the ‘ban’ on the category ‘women’ has caused. Contrary to many contemporary feminist theorists, I contend that, although the category ‘women’ does not reflect the whole reality of concrete and particular women, it nevertheless refers to something real, namely the structural position as woman.

  • 3.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    Accumulated worthiness?: Women and men, love and authority2008In: Gender and the interests of love: essays in honour of Anna G. Jónasdóttir / [ed] Kathleen B. Jones, Gunnel Karlsson, Örebro: Örebro University , 2008Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Amarlo por quién es: la microsociología del poder2015In: Sociológica, ISSN 0187-0173, Vol. 30, no 85, p. 235-258Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 5.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Bereit für die Liebe?2010In: Briefe aus der Ferne: Anforderungen an ein feministisches Projekt heute / [ed] Frigga Haug, Hamburg: Argument , 2010, p. 131-138Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 6. Gunnarsson, Lena
    Besvärliga begär2005In: Bang: feministisk kulturtidskrift, ISSN 1102-4593, no 1, p. 36-39Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 7.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Breaking intellectual taboos with Roy by my side2015In: Journal of Critical Realism, ISSN 1476-7430, E-ISSN 1572-5138, Vol. 14, no 2, p. 121-124Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    Den postmoderna återvändsgränden: eller varför dialektiken fortfarande är positivismens mest radikala motståndare2005In: Socialistisk Debatt, ISSN 0346-1491, no 1, p. 89-101Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 9.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Department of Gender Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    “Excuse Me, But Are You Raping Me Now?”: Discourse and Experience in (the Grey Areas of) Sexual Violence2018In: NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, ISSN 0803-8740, E-ISSN 1502-394X, Vol. 26, no 1, p. 4-18Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In feminist research on sexual violence and victimization, the relationship between discourse and experience has often been at the forefront of intense debates. Poststructuralist scholars have emphasized that the discourses used to name sexual violence may in fact perpetuate the very problem they set out to describe, by freezing women into powerless positions of rapability. Others have likened this sort of argument to anti-feminist trivialization of the pervasively gendered experiential reality to which such discourses refer, highlighting that women’s victimization is not a discursive problem. In this article, I seek to carve out a path that cuts through such polarization by exploring the multifaceted dialectical relationship between, on one hand, gendered discourses on sex and sexual violence and, on the other, people’s reported experiences of these phenomena and, in particular, of the ‘grey area’ between sex and sexual violence; I do this by analysing autobiographical stories from the influential Swedish campaign #prataomdet (#talkaboutit), which emphasized the need for a new language that can do justice to people’s experiences of sexual violence and the grey area between sex and sexual violence.

  • 10.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Familjen – stötdämpare och avfallscentral2006In: Socialistisk Debatt, no 1, p. 103-112Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Frö av feminism i marxismen2006In: Socialistisk Debatt, no 1, p. 113-118Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 12.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    GEXcel Work in Progress Report. Volume III: Proceedings from GEXcel Theme 1: Gender, Sexuality and Global Change. Spring 20082008Conference proceedings (editor) (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Gubbar, stress och kaxiga tjejer: En studie av könets betydelse för tiden som doktorand vid Örebro universitet2009Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 14.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Hetero‐Love in Patriarchy: An Autobiographical Substantiation2017In: Hypatia, ISSN 0887-5367, E-ISSN 1527-2001, Vol. 32, no 1, p. 187-192Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    By means of autoethnographic inquiry, the author offers a substantiation of her previous theoretical elaborations on how heterosexual women may liberate themselves from the oppressive contradictions of hetero-love as constellated in contemporary patriarchy.

  • 15.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Ist Die Linke Bereit Für Die Liebe?: Die Schwedishe Linkspartei Und Der Feminismus2009In: Anforderungen an Ein Linkes Feministisches Projekt Heute: Ergebnisse Einer Internationalen Umfrage: Beiträge Zur Programmdiskussion Der Linken / [ed] Frigga Haug, Berlin: Die Linke , 2009, p. 44-46Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 16.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    "Jag tar aldrig initiativet till sex"2005In: Flamman, ISSN 1403-7424, no 1 sepArticle in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 17.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Love – exploitable resource or ‘No-lose situation’?: Reconciling Jónasdóttir’s feminist view with Bhaskar’s philosophy of meta-reality2011In: Journal of Critical Realism, ISSN 1476-7430, E-ISSN 1572-5138, Vol. 10, no 4, p. 419-441Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article I attempt to reconcile two seemingly conflictingtheorizations of love, the one elaborated by Roy Bhaskar as part of hisphilosophy of metaReality and Anna G. Jónasdóttir’s historical materialist-radical feminist theory of ‘love power’. While Bhaskar emphasizes theessentially non-dual character of love, envisioning it as a ‘no-lose situation’,Jónasdóttir stresses the antagonistic features structuring love relationsby conceptualizing love as a productive power of which men tend toexploit women. Rather than seeing these accounts as mutually exclusiveI show that they can be reconciled by aid of the general ontology elaboratedby Bhaskar in his philosophy of metaReality.

  • 18.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Department of Gender Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    Love, Feminism and Dialectics: Repairing Splits in Theory and Practice2018In: Feminism and the power of love: Interdisciplinary interventions / [ed] Adriana García-Andrade, Lena Gunnarsson, Anna G. Jónasdóttir, London: Routledge, 2018Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Gunnarsson highlights how dialectics can shed light on the relation between love and dominance, foregrounding the crucial role that ontological tensions play in self–other relating.Drawing on Roy Bhaskar’s dialectical critical realist philosophy, she expands on Jessica Benjamin’s analysis of male dominance as well as other feminist work, and elaborates on the necessity of living-with rather than seeking to escape constitutive tensions, if we are to be able to live non-oppressively and sustainably with one another.Gunnarsson also demonstrates how dialectics can account for the fact that life-enhancing impulses are often co-enfolded in oppressive practicesand elaborates on the implications that this has for the prospect of transformation.

  • 19.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Loving him for who he is: Pinpointing the mechanisms of female subordination in heterosexual couple love2011In: GEXcel Work in Progress ReportVolume VII: Proceedings from GEXcel Theme 10:Love in Our Time – A Question for FeminismSpring 2010 / [ed] So!a Strid and Anna G. Jónasdóttir, Örebro/Linköping: GEXcel , 2011Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Loving him for who he is: The microsociology of power2014In: Love: a question for feminism in the twenty first century / [ed] Anna G. Jónasdóttir and Ann Ferguson, New York: Routledge, 2014, p. 97-110Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The chapter theorizes the tension inherent in contemporary western heterosexual love between, on one hand, norms of gender equality and freedom to choose and, on the other, persisting gender inequality. Focusing on the empirically documented asymmetry in love ‘exchanges’ as such between women and men, I ask how this tendency comes about despite the fact that mutual love is the raison d’être of the relationship, that the ideological context prescribes gender equality and that there are no salient external factors that stop women from breaking up in case they are not satisfied.

    My main argument is that, since what we normally (can) expect from women and men differs, what tends to evoke gratitude, appreciation and love is also gendered. Hence, even if an individual man practices reciprocity in love, he will still be structurally advantaged to the extent that his behaviour implies a positive break with what can be expected from men in general. This tends to make the woman more grateful than the man – despite the actual symmetry – and thereby the asymmetry is paradoxically reinstated.

  • 21.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Nature, Love and the Limits of Male Power2015In: Journal of Critical Realism, ISSN 1476-7430, E-ISSN 1572-5138, Vol. 14, no 3, p. 325-332Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    It has long been taboo for feminist theorists to draw on notions of nature in their conceptualizations of gender relations. Objecting to this nature-phobia, I argue that we need to anchor our social theories in explicit notions of the natural necessities on which any social structure draws and must ultimately accommodate. Such a reference to a ‘natural ontological order’ is needed not only for explaining how power structures can get a hold over people, but also for specifying the ways in which the natural necessities impose absolute constraints on the forms that oppressive structures can take, ultimately creating a conatus to getting rid of the oppressive structure. In the human-social realm a crucial aspect of nature is those basic human needs that any society must meet in order to reproduce itself. One such human need that has been theoretically overlooked, although often implicitly assumed, is the need for love. Drawing on Anna G. Jónasdóttir's theory of ‘love power’, I elaborate on the contradictions inherent in the power that men acquire by exploiting women's love, arguing that these contradictions can be understood only with reference to natural necessities.

  • 22.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    On the Ontology of Love, Sexuality and Power: Towards a Feminist-Realist Depth Approach2013Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The thesis offers a theoretical account of how and why, in contemporary western societies characterized by formal-legal equality and women’s relative economic independence, women continue to be subordinated to men through sexuality and love. By means of an innovative application of Roy Bhaskar’s critical realism, dialectical critical realism and philosophy of metaReality, it investigates and elaborates Anna G. Jónasdóttir’s claim that men tend to exploit women of their ‘love power’. Also, the thesis advances a critique of the state of affairs of contemporary feminist theory, demonstrating that the meta-theoretical framework of critical realism offers tools that can counter the poststructuralist hegemony in feminist theory.

    Part I engages in a comprehensive evaluation of Catharine MacKinnon’s, Judith Butler’s and Jónasdóttir’s theorizations of sexuality and gendered power. Insofar as the works of these theorists represent different philosophical paradigms, this critique opens up a discussion of more general meta-theoretical issues, which are elaborated in Part II, where poststructuralist feminist positions are challenged. Following Jónasdóttir’s broadening of the concept of sexuality so as to essentially include practices of love, in Part III the focus of the thesis is shifted from sexuality to love. Here a dialectical deepening and partial recasting of Jónasdóttir’s work is offered, by means of an application of dialectical critical realism and the philosophy of metaReality.

    The thesis outlines a feminist dialectical-realist depth ontology of love, sexuality and power, which constitutes an alternative to dominant discursive approaches to sexuality and attributes to love its proper place in our existence as sexual human creatures. Although the thesis makes a case for the tenacity of female subordination in and through sexuality and love, it ends on a more optimistic note, by offering a model of how women can break the shackles of love.

  • 23.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Review of On Love: A Philosophy for the Twenty-first Century by Luc Ferry2015In: Journal of Critical Realism, ISSN 1476-7430, E-ISSN 1572-5138, Vol. 14, no 4, p. 420-424Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Review of Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. By Eva Illouz2014In: Journal of Critical Realism, ISSN 1476-7430, E-ISSN 1572-5138, Vol. 13, no 1, p. 102-105Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 25.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    Sova med fienden: feminister berättar om att ha sex med män2007In: Socialistisk debatt, ISSN 0346-1491, no 1, p. 35-54Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
    Abstract [sv]

    Intervju med tre unga, heterosexuella feminister.

  • 26.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    The Contradictions of Love: Towards a feminist-realist ontology of sociosexuality2014Book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The Contradictions of Love: Towards a feminist-realist ontology of sociosexuality offers a robust and multifaceted theoretical account of how, in contemporary western societies, women continue to be subordinated to men through sexual love. The book defends and elaborates Anna G. Jónasdóttir’s thesis that men tend to exploit women of their ‘love power’, by means of an innovative application of critical realism, dialectical critical realism and the philosophy of metaReality. Gunnarson also offers a critique of the state of affairs of contemporary feminist theory.

    The author demonstrates that the meta-theoretical framework of critical realism offers the tools that can counter the poststructuralist hegemony still prevailing in feminist theory. On a general level, The Contradictions of Love attempts at reconciling theoretical positions which tend to appear in opposition to one another. In particular, it offers a way of bridging the gap between the notion of love as a locus of exploitation and that of love as a force which can conquer oppression.

    This book is a unique and timely contribution in the field of feminist theory, in that it offers the first elaborate assessment and development of Jónasdóttir’s important but relatively sidestepped work, and in that it counters poststructuralist trends from the point of view of a robust critical realist framework that has hitherto been spectacularly absent in feminist theory, although it offers solutions to metatheoretical problems at the forefront of feminist debates; in the field of critical realism broadly defined, in that it elaborates on crucial ontological themes of (dialectical) critical realism and the philosophy of metaReality via a discussion of the issues of love, sexuality, gender and power; and finally, in the field of love studies, in that it offers a sophisticated account of how gender asymmetries prevail in love despite norms of gender equality and reciprocity, and in that it reconciles feminist, conflict-oriented perspectives on love with notions of love as transcending conflict.

  • 27.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    The Dominant and Its Constitutive Other: Feminist Theorizations of Love, Power and Gendered Selves2016In: Journal of Critical Realism, ISSN 1476-7430, E-ISSN 1572-5138, Vol. 15, no 1, p. 1-20Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article I explore love’s relation to gendered power asymmetries by comparing Anna Jónasdóttir’s, Jessica Benjamin’s and Teresa Brennan’s respective theorizations of this theme. Despite the considerable differences between these feminist frameworks, they can all be read in terms of what I call the figure of the Dominant and its Constitutive Other. This refers to the contradictory relation whereby the powerful and‘independent’existence of the one is premised on that which is other to it, as well as on the denial and obscuring of this constitutive dependence. Via a dialogue with critical realist and metaReal themes I move from a concern with how the feminine‘Other’ tacitly constitutes the masculine Dominant through practices of love, to thematizing the basic stratum of being as the constitutive Other of the oppressive economy of love. The structure of the self emerges as a central organizing principle in the oppressive relations considered, and the article explores what might be a non-violent mode of self that does not depend on suppressing the existence of that on which it depends

  • 28.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    The naturalistic turn in feminist theory: a Marxist-realist contribution2013In: Feminist Theory, ISSN 1464-7001, E-ISSN 1741-2773, Vol. 14, no 1, p. 3-19Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    After a time dominated by nature-phobia, a naturalistic turn is emerging within feminist theory. Welcoming this new theoretical embrace of nature and sympathising with its insistence that nature is not feminism’s enemy, this article nevertheless points to some problematic features of this turn. Focusing on Elizabeth Grosz’s postmodernist readings of Charles Darwin, I suggest that their emphasis of nature’s dynamic, indeterminate and enabling qualities both implies a politically unmotivated glorification of the dynamic and unruly, and as such obscures the important fact that nature also works as a constraining factor on societies. I demonstrate, from the point of view of a Marxist-realist perspective, why an acknowledgement of nature’s limiting force is crucial for the coherence of any theoretical account of the workings of social systems. The article also addresses the feminist imperative to transcend the dualism between nature and culture, and shows how the concept of emergence offers a solution to dilemmas that tend to appear in connection to such efforts of transcendence.

  • 29.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Why we keep separating the ‘inseparable’: Dialecticizing intersectionality2017In: The European Journal of Women's Studies, ISSN 1350-5068, E-ISSN 1461-7420, Vol. 24, no 2, p. 114-127Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Disputes about how to understand intersectional relations often pivot around the tension between separateness and inseparability, where some scholars emphasise the need to separate between different intersectional categories while others claim they are inseparable. In this article I take issue with the either/or thinking that underpins what I see as an unnecessary and unproductive polarization in the debate over the in/separability of intersectional categories. Drawing on Roy Bhaskar’s dialectical critical realist philosophy, I argue that we can think of intersectional categories as well as different ontological levels as both distinct and unified and elaborate on the significance of the dialectical notion of unity-in-difference for intersectional studies. As part of the argument I address the issue of what it actually means for something to be distinct or separate as opposed to inseparable or unified with something else, demonstrating that lack of clarity about this is at the heart of polarized arguments about separateness versus inseparability in intersectionality theory.

  • 30.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    et al.
    Department of Gender Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    García-Andrade, Adriana
    Department of Sociology, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), México.
    Jonasdottir, Anna G.
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    The Power of Love: Towards an interdisciplinary and multi-theoretical feminist love studies2018In: Feminism and the power of love: Interdisciplinary Interventions / [ed] Adriana García-Andrade, Lena Gunnarsson and Anna G. Jónasdóttir, London and New York: Routledge, 2018, 1Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 31.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    et al.
    Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    Ingen, Michiel van
    London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
    Martínez Dy, Angela
    Glendonbrook Institute for Enterprise Development, Loughborough University, London, United Kingdom.
    Critical Realism, Gender and Feminism: Exchanges, Challenges, Synergies2018In: Gender, feminism and critical realism: Exchanges, challenges, synergies / [ed] Lena Gunnarsson, Angela Martínez Dy, Michiel van Ingen, London: Routledge, 2018Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 32.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    et al.
    Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
    Ingen, Michiel vanLondon School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.Martínez Dy, AngelaGlendonbrook Institute for Enterprise Development, Loughborough University, London, United Kingdom.
    Gender, feminism and critical realism: Exchanges, challenges, synergies2018Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 33.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Jónasdóttir, Anna G.
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    För ett brett fält av feministiska kärleksstudier2016In: Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, ISSN 1654-5443, E-ISSN 2001-1377, Vol. 37, no 2, p. 3-10Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 34.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    et al.
    Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    Jónasdóttir, Anna G.Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    GEXcel Work in Progress Report. Volume IV: Proceedings from Gexcel Theme 1: Gender, Sexuality and Global Change. Conference of Workshops. 22 – 25 May, 20082008Conference proceedings (editor) (Other academic)
  • 35.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    et al.
    Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    Jónasdóttir, Anna G.Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.Karlsson, GunnelÖrebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
    GEXcel Work in Progress Report. Volume II: Proceedings from GEXcel Theme 1: Gender, Sexuality and Global Change. Fall 20072008Conference proceedings (editor) (Other academic)
  • 36.
    Gunnarsson, Lena
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Martínez Dy, Angela
    Loughborough University, London, UK.
    van Ingen, Michiel
    University of Westminster, London, UK.
    Critical Realism, Gender and Feminism: Exchanges, Challenges, Synergies2016In: Journal of Critical Realism, ISSN 1476-7430, E-ISSN 1572-5138, Vol. 15, no 5, p. 433-439Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Editorial to the special issue of JCR on Critical Realism, Gender and Feminism

  • 37.
    Strid, Sofia
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Husu, LiisaÖrebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.Gunnarsson, LenaÖrebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
    Gender paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s): GEXcel Work in Progress Report, Volume X Proceedings from GEXcel Themes 11-122012Conference proceedings (editor) (Other academic)
1 - 37 of 37
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf