oru.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 15 of 15
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Petersson, Joakim
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
    Kvinnors rätt till trygghet2015Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 2.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University, Australia.
    Characteristics and Recidivism in Relation to Arrest: Differentiating Between Partner Violent Perpetrator Subtypes2020In: Nordic Journal of Criminology, ISSN 2578-983XArticle in journal (Refereed)
  • 3.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne Victoria, Australia.
    Family-only perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review2020In: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, ISSN 1524-8380, E-ISSN 1552-8324, Vol. 21, no 2, p. 367-381Article, review/survey (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article presents the first systematic review of family-only intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators (as originally proposed by Holtzworth-Munroe & Stuart). The aims of the present review were to summarize and describe the prevalence of the family-only perpetrator subtype, as well as to investigate what characteristics were associated with perpetrators within this subtype. Electronic literature searches in several databases (e.g., PsychINFO, Web of Science, and PubMed) were carried out. Of the 3,434 studies identified, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria as well as the methodological quality criteria. Thematic analyses were conducted, where several themes and subthemes were identified. The proportion of family-only perpetrators, averaged across sample types, was 47.5%. Drawing on the thematic analyses of the reviewed studies, family-only perpetrators presented as a less violent subtype, displaying several pro-social personality traits, as well as a lower degree of psychopathology. The findings were inline with Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart’s predictions. The findings also demonstrated the utility of a 2-fold typology, consisting of a family-only and a generally violent (GV) subtype, as well as the need to reconsider the one-size-fits-all approach to IPV treatment. We also included a discussion of the terminology of the subtypes and propose an adoption of the terms “partner onlyviolent” and “generally violent” subtypes.

  • 4.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
    Policing family violence in rural areas2017Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This presentation will describe the primary results of a prospective research project spanning over eight years (2009-2016), introducing a structured approach to policing family violence. This research project was funded by the Swedish Crime Victim Support and Compensation Authority. The aim of the research project was to implement and evaluate the use of structured professional judgments tool of assessing violence for risk. More specifically, risk assessment checklists for intimate partner violence, stalking, and honor related violence was introduced as a working method within the two Swedish police districts of Jämtland and Västernorrland. The first phase of the project constituted of the implementation of the risk assessment checklists. This involved training the police in how to use the checklists. The second phase of the project constituted of data collection and evaluation. Thus, risk assessments performed between 2011 and 2014 for all police-reported cases of intimate partner violence, stalking, and honor related violence in the two police districts were collected. Furthermore, risk management strategies recommended by the police, in order to prevent future violence, were evaluated. Additionally, qualitative interviews with police and district attorneys were conducted. The results demonstrated that the use of structured violence risk assessment checklists works well within the Swedish police to reduce the risk for violence by suggesting proper risk management. However, the results demonstrated that there was no existing routine for documenting the risk management strategies, making follow up evaluation of their efficacy difficult. Finally, an overall presentation of the research papers produced, based on the results of this project, will be given.

  • 5.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
    Recidivism in intimate partner violence among antisocial and family-only perpetrators2017Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Research of recidivism among intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrator subtypes has demonstrated inconclusive results. The present study sought to outline the recidivism patterns between two subtypes; antisocial and family-only perpetrators. The aim of this study was to compare these subtypes regarding IPV recidivism rates and type of recidivism crime. We also explored and compared time to IPV recidivism between the subtypes. In this prospective study data was obtained from the Swedish police. The material constituted of 628 male IPV perpetrators subjected to a structured violence risk assessment between 2011 and 2014 in two Swedish police districts. The perpetrators were categorized as antisocial (n = 327) or family-only (n = 301) based on general criminality. Recidivism was measured as any new police report of an IPV related crime. Results demonstrated that antisocial perpetrators recidivated to a larger extent than family-only perpetrators (27.2% vs. 12.9%). Antisocial perpetrators were more prone to recidivate in both physical and non-physical violence. Furthermore, antisocial perpetrators had a longer critical time period for recidivism and recidivated faster in non-physically violent IPV compared to family-only perpetrators. These findings highlight the need to consider different risk management strategies depending on the type of IPV perpetrator in order to prevent future violence.

  • 6.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
    Recidivism in Intimate Partner Violence Among Antisocial and Family-Only Perpetrators2017In: Criminal justice and behavior, ISSN 0093-8548, E-ISSN 1552-3594, Vol. 44, no 11, p. 1477-1495Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The aim of this study was to compare antisocial and family-only intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators in terms of IPV recidivism rates, type of recidivism crime, and time to recidivism. A total sample of 628 perpetrators was categorized as antisocial (n = 327) or family-only (n = 301) based on general criminality. Results demonstrated that antisocial perpetrators recidivated to a larger extent than family-only perpetrators (27.2% vs. 12.9%). Antisocial perpetrators were more prone to recidivate in both physical and nonphysical violence. Of the perpetrators who recidivated, the majority did so within the first year after their index crime. However, antisocial perpetrators recidivated more than family-only perpetrators after the first year. key findings consisted of the subtypes’ differing propensity to reoffend and their different critical time periods for recidivism. These findings suggest the need for different risk management strategies depending on perpetrator subtype to prevent future violence.

  • 7.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
    Selenius, Heidi
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Hur ökad kunskap om partnervåldsförövare kan förhindra våldsutsatthet2015Conference paper (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Föreliggande presentation ämnar redogöra för mitt avhandlingsprojekt. Detta baseras på ett av Brottsoffermyndigheten finansierat projekt om användandet av strukturerade riskbedömningar inom polisen för att förhindra våld. Forskning har visat att användandet av strukturerade checklistor för bedömning av risk är en välfungerande metod att använda inom såväl polis, kriminalvård och rättspsykiatri för bedömning och hantering av risk för våld. Projektet ”Strukturerade vs ostrukturerade riskbedömningar för våld”, som avslutas sommaren 2016, initierades 2009 av kriminologisektionen vid Mittuniversitetet i Sundsvall. En strukturerad arbetsmetod, bestående av strukturerade checklistor för partnervåld, stalkning och hedersrelaterat våld, implementerades i Jämtlands samt Västernorrlands polismyndighet. En sådan checklista var Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide: Short Version (SARA: SV). Denna checklista syftar till att förhindra partnervåld genom att erbjuda ett strukturerat och systematiskt tillvägagångssätt att bedöma risk för upprepat sådant våld.

    Den första delstudien i avhandlingen baseras på sådana SARA: SV- bedömningar och fokuserar på karaktäristika hos olika subtyper av misstänkta partnervåldsförövare. Dessa förövare fördelades i två grupper baserat på typ av våld. Tidigare forskning på området har påvisat att partnervåldsförövare utgör en heterogen grupp, varvid klassificeringen av sådana förövare har uppmärksammats som ett viktigt forskningsområde. En av de mest distinkt särskiljande drag som karaktäriserar olika subtyper av partnervåldsförövare är våldets generalitet. De förövare som ej begränsar sitt våldsutövande enbart till sin partner (så kallade ”antisociala förövare”) har uppvisat flertalet unika karaktäristika jämfört med de förövare som enbart är våldsamma mot sin partner (så kallade ”family-only-förövare”). Bland annat har de antisociala förövarna i större utsträckning missbruksproblem, psykiska problem och använder allvarligare våld jämfört med family-only-förövare (se exempelvis Thijssen & de Ruiter, 2011; Walsh et al., 2010).

    En av de främsta anledningarna till att identifiera sådana subtyper är möjligheten att i större utsträckning förhindra partnervåld. Genom att ta hänsyn till de individuella skillnader som finns hos olika subtyper av partnervåldsförövare kan mest lämpliga riskhanteringstrategi för respektive subtyp användas. Ett sådant förfarande syftar i slutändan till att minimera risken för upprepad viktimisering för den drabbade. Mot bakgrund av detta presenteras upplägget och genomförandet av den första delstudien i avhandlingen. Studien kommer mer specifikt att undersöka eventuella skillnader i bakgrundsfaktorer och riskfaktorer för upprepat partnervåld, mellan antisociala- och family-only- förövare. Datainsamlingen har genomförts och preliminära analyser kommer att presenteras. Slutligen kommer även upplägget och planeringen för den andra delstudien i avhandlingsprojektet kort att presenteras. Denna studie kommer att bygga vidare på dessa subtyper av partnervåldsförövare och undersöka återfall i brottslighet.

  • 8.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University Australia.
    Selenius, Heidi
    Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
    One size does not fit all: How typologies of intimate partner violent men can inform and facilitate police risk assessment and management of such violence2018Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 9.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
    Selenius, Heidi
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Risk factors for intimate partner violence: A comparison of antisocial and family-only perpetrators2019In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, ISSN 0886-2605, E-ISSN 1552-6518, Vol. 34, no 2, p. 219-239Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Subtyping male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) based ontheir generality of violence could facilitate the difficult task of matchingperpetrator subtype with efficient risk management strategies. As such, theaim of the present study was to compare antisocial and family-only maleperpetrators of interpersonal violence in terms of (a) demographic andlegal characteristics, (b) risk factors for violence, and (c) assessed risk andthe importance of specific risk factors for violence. A quantitative designwas used in this retrospective register study on data obtained from theSwedish police. Risk assessments performed with the Swedish version ofthe Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER) andpolice registers were used. A sample of 657 male alleged IPV perpetratorswere classified as antisocial (n = 341) or family-only (n = 316) based on theirgenerality of violence. The results showed that the antisocial perpetratorswere significantly younger, as well as more psychologically abusive. Antisocialperpetrators also had significantly more present risk factors for IPV, and wereassessed with a significantly higher risk for acute and severe or deadly IPV, compared with the family-only perpetrators. The subtypes also evidencedunique risk factors with a significant impact on elevated risk for acute andsevere or deadly such violence. Key findings in the present study concernedthe subtypes evidencing unique risk factors increasing the risk for acute andsevere or deadly IPV. Major implications of this study include the findings ofsuch unique “red flag” risk factors for each subtype. To prevent future IPV,it is vital for the risk assessor to be aware of these red flags when makingdecisions about risk, as well as risk management strategies.

  • 10.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
    Strand, Susanne
    Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
    Selenius, Heidi
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Risk factors for intimate partner violence: A comparison of antisocial and family-only perpetrators2016Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) are a heterogeneous group. Thus, they demonstrate different risk factors for violence and require different risk management interventions. Subtyping IPV perpetrators could facilitate the task of matching perpetrators with adequate interventions, aiming for IPV prevention. The present study compared differences between antisocial and family-only perpetrators, regarding risk factors for IPV, assessed risk and the importance of specific risk factors for such violence. In this retrospective file study, data was obtained from the Swedish police. Risk assessments performed with the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER; Kropp, Hart, & Belfrage, 2008), and police registers were used. A sample of 657 male alleged perpetrators of IPV were classified as eitherantisocial (n= 341) orfamily-only (n= 316) perpetrators, based on their generality of violence as assessed within the B-SAFER. The results demonstrated that antisocial perpetrators had significantly more risk factors for IPV present in the B-SAFER, and were assessed with significantly higher risk for acute and severe or deadly IPV, compared to the family-only perpetrators. The subtypes also evidenced unique (i.e., ‘red flag’) risk factors that had significant impact on elevated risk ratings for acute and severe or deadly IPV. Key findings, concerning the importance of the unique risk factors for IPV for each subtype, will be discussed. In a risk assessment and management context, these ‘red flag’ risk factors are important to consider when determining overall risk and recommending management strategies.

  • 11.
    Petersson, Joakim
    et al.
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
    Strand, Susanne
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
    Storey, Jennifer E.
    Selenius, Heidi
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Fröberg, Sofi
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Implementing effective police risk assessment and management for family violence2016Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 12.
    Selenius, Heidi
    et al.
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
    Strand, Susanne
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden; Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
    Petersson, Joakim
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
    Recidivism among perpetrators of gross violation of a woman´s integrity in Sweden2015Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Strand, Susanne
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Petersson, Joakim
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Risk management of Domestic Violence2019In: The EU Mutual Learning Programme in Gender Equality: Preventing domestic violence with Men and Boys: Challenges and Opportunities, European Commission, 2019Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 14.
    Strand, Susanne
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
    Petersson, Joakim
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
    Fröberg, Sofi
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Storey, Jennifer E.
    School of Law, University of London, London, UK.
    Polisens arbete med riskbedömning och riskhantering för partnervåldsrelaterad brottslighet: Implementering och utvärdering av införandet av strukturerade riskbedömningar för partnervåldsrelaterad brottslighet som en arbetsmetod vid polismyndigheterna i Västernorrland och Jämtland under perioden 2011-20142016Report (Other academic)
  • 15.
    Strand, Susanne
    et al.
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
    Petersson, Joakim
    Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
    Storey, Jennifer
    Royal Holloway, University of London, UK.
    Policing intimate partner violence in rural areas in Sweden2017Conference paper (Refereed)
1 - 15 of 15
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf