Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >> (Engelska)Manuskript (preprint) (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]
This article analyzes the recurrent “erosion thesis” in the governance literature arguing that bureaucratic or procedural government institutions have come to play a less significant role in the formation of public policy. This article supports these claims by drawing evidence from the Swedish and neo-corporatist policy-making institutions referred to as the ‘governmental commissions’ and the perspective of interest organizations. Using various theories on institutional change I show that increasing government steering has reduced the role of the governmental commissions in influencing policy, but has not eliminated interest organizations’ belief that they are legitimate institutions. The resulting article concludes that although the governmental commissions have eroded, the capability of the state to steer or govern society has not necessarily declined.
Nationell ämneskategori
Statsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-38225 (URN)
Anmärkning
Published as:
Injured But Not Yet Dead: A Bottom-Up Perspective on the Swedish Governmental Commissions
International Journal of Public Administration, ISSN 0190-0692, E-ISSN 1532-4265, Vol. 38, nr 5, s. 346-354
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2014.938818
2014-10-292014-10-292022-11-28Bibliografiskt granskad