oru.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
Avgränsa sökresultatet
1 - 5 av 5
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Träffar per sida
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
Markera
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Sriwannawit, Pranpreya
    et al.
    Department of Industrial Economics and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Sandström, Ulf
    Örebro universitet, Handelshögskolan vid Örebro Universitet.
    Large-scale bibliometric review of diffusion research2015Ingår i: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 102, nr 2, s. 1615-1645Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Despite the fact that diffusion research has existed for more than a century, a quantitative review covering this subject in a broad and general context is still lacking. This article reviews diffusion research by providing an extensive bibliometric and clustering analysis. In total, we identified thirteen clusters comprising 6,811 publications over the period of 2002-2011, and thereby describe the characteristics of diffusion research in an extensive and general way based on quantitative bibliometric methods. The analysis reveals that diffusion research is highly interdisciplinary in character, involving several disciplines from ethnology to economics, with many overlapping research trails. The concluding section indicates that diffusion research seems to be data driven and relies heavily on solely empirical studies. Consequently, influential publications rely on empirical data that support and change theories in modest ways only. In this contribution, we propose a review method that produces a fairly good overview of the research area and which can be applied to any knowledge field to replace or complement the traditional literature review.

  • 2.
    van den Besselaar, Peter
    et al.
    Department of Social Informatics, Vrije University, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Network Institution, Vrije University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    Sandström, Ulf
    Örebro universitet. INDEK, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Does Quantity Make a Difference?2015Ingår i: Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics , 2015, s. 577-583Konferensbidrag (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Do highly productive researchers have significantly higher probability to produce top cited papers? Or does the increased productivity in science only result in a sea of irrelevant papers as a perverse effect of competition and the increased use of indicators for research evaluation and accountability focus? We use a Swedish author disambiguated dataset consisting of 48,000 researchers and their WoS-listed publications during the period of 2008-2011 with citations until 2014 to investigate the relation between productivity and production of highly cited papers. As the analysis shows, quantity does make a difference.

  • 3.
    van den Besselaar, Peter
    et al.
    Department of Organization Science & Network Institute, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    Sandström, Ulf
    Örebro universitet, Handelshögskolan vid Örebro Universitet. INDEK, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden; Business School, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
    Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions2015Ingår i: Journal of Informetrics, ISSN 1751-1577, E-ISSN 1875-5879, Vol. 9, nr 4, s. 826-838Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The main rationale behind career grants is helping top talent to develop into the next generation leading scientists. Does career grant competition result in the selection of the best young talents? In this paper we investigate whether the selected applicants are indeed performing at the expected excellent level something that is hardly investigated in the research literature.

    We investigate the predictive validity of grant decision-making, using a sample of 260 early career grant applications in three social science fields. We measure output and impact of the applicants about ten years after the application to find out whether the selected researchers perform ex post better than the non-successful ones. Overall, we find that predictive validity is low to moderate when comparing grantees with all non-successful applicants. Comparing grantees with the best performing non-successful applicants, predictive validity is absent. This implies that the common belief that peers in selection panels are good in recognizing outstanding talents is incorrect. We also investigate the effects of the grants on careers and show that recipients of the grants do have a better career than the non-granted applicants. This makes the observed lack of predictive validity even more problematic.

  • 4.
    van den Besselaar, Peter
    et al.
    Department of Organization Sciences & Network Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    Sandström, Ulf
    Örebro universitet. INDEK, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study2016Ingår i: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 106, nr 1, s. 143-162Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    We take up the issue of performance differences between male and female researchers, and investigate the change of performance differences during the early career. In a previous paper it was shown that among starting researchers gendered performance differences seem small to non-existent (Van Arensbergen et al. 2012). If the differences do not occur in the early career anymore, they may emerge in a later period, or may remain absent. In this paper we use the same sample of male and female researchers, but now compare performance levels about 10 years later. We use various performance indicators: full/fractional counted productivity, citation impact, and relative citation impact in terms of the share of papers in the top 10 % highly cited papers. After the 10 years period, productivity of male researchers has grown faster than of female researcher, but the field normalized (relative) citation impact indicators of male and female researchers remain about equal. Furthermore, performance data do explain to a certain extent why male careers in our sample develop much faster than female researchers' careers; but controlling for performance differences, we find that gender is an important determinant too. Consequently, the process of hiring academic staff still remains biased.

  • 5.
    Wang, Qi
    et al.
    INDEK, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Sandström, Ulf
    Örebro universitet, Handelshögskolan vid Örebro Universitet. INDEK, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology2015Ingår i: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, Vol. 24, nr 3, s. 271-281Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The aim of this article is twofold: (1) to provide a methodology for measurement of cognitive distance between researchers and (2) to explore the role of cognitive distance on the results of peer review processes. Cited references and the content of articles are used to represent their respective scientific knowledge bases. Based on the two different approaches-Author-Bibliographic Coupling analysis and Author-Topic analysis-we apply the methodology on a recent competition for grants from the Swedish Strategic Foundation. Results indicate that cognitive distances between applicants and reviewers might influence peer review results, but that the impact is to some extent at the unexpected end. The main contribution of this article is the elaboration on the relevance of the concept of cognitive distance to the issue of research evaluation in general, and especially in relation to peer review as a model used in grant decisions.

1 - 5 av 5
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf