Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Visa övriga...
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, ISSN 0020-7292, E-ISSN 1879-3479, Vol. 142, nr 3, s. 359-364Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether self-sampling is as reliable as professional sampling for HPV testing and genotype detection among postmenopausal women.
METHODS: In the present prospective cross-sectional study, women in Örebro County, Sweden, who had high-risk HPV (hrHPV) and normal cytology results in exit screening tests conducted in between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014, were invited to follow-up screenings between February 24, 2015 and May 15, 2015, that included professional sampling and self-sampling. HPV genotypes were identified by a DNA-based assay that could detect 35 HPV genotypes. Findings between the different sampling methods were compared.
RESULTS: Of 143 women who participated, 119 returned a self-sample. Completely concordant results were observed in 67 of these samples when both hrHPV and low-risk HPV genotypes were analyzed. Overall, 99 (83.2%) women had the same clinically relevant finding from both sampling methods. Twenty women had discordant hrHPV results (hrHPV detected in 10 self-samples vs 10 professionally collected samples; Cohen κ 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.80). There was no significant difference between the two sampling methods for clinically significant infections (P>0.99) or extended genotyping (P=0.827).
CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women could be offered self-sampling devices to increase screening-program coverage while maintaining test quality.
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2018
Nyckelord
Cervical cancer, HPV, Postmenopausal women, Professional sampling, Screening, Self-sample
Nationell ämneskategori
Cancer och onkologi Gynekologi, obstetrik och reproduktionsmedicin
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-67134 (URN)10.1002/ijgo.12538 (DOI)000440652000017 ()29856071 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85051073715 (Scopus ID)
Anmärkning
Funding Agencies:
Region Örebro County Research Committee
Örebro University Hospital Research Foundation
BBMRI.se
2018-06-042018-06-042025-02-11Bibliografiskt granskad