To Örebro University

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained increasing popularity worldwide, yet concerns persist regarding the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) postoperatively.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of technical aspects of LSG, specifically bougie size and distance from the pylorus to resection line edge, on the risk of developing symptomatic GERD within 2years following surgery.

SETTING: Data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) and the National Prescribed Drug Register were utilized for this analysis.

METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted encompassing all LSG patients in Sweden between 2012 and 2020 who did not receive preoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions. Patients were categorized based on bougie size and pyloric distance. Regular PPI use, defined as a dispensed prescription of more than 300 tablets per year, was employed as a proxy measure of symptomatic GERD and was compared between the groups.

RESULTS: The study included 7,435 patients with complete data on dispensed PPI prescription both preoperatively and throughout the 2-year follow-up period. Information on bougie size and pyloric distance was available for 97.4% and 84.9%, respectively. Narrower bougie size and greater pyloric distance were associated with increased risk of regular PPI use postsurgery. Advanced age and female sex were independent risk factors for post-LSG regular PPI use, while initial body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (%TWL), and comorbidities showed no significant associations.

CONCLUSIONS: Using a narrow bougie and initiating resection at a greater distance from the pylorus were associated with higher risk of symptomatic de novo GERD following LSG.

Introduction: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the clinical outcomes of two surgical interventions for obesity treatment: single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS). The SADI procedure was developed as a response to the challenges posed by the BPD/DS procedure, aiming to enhance surgical efficiency, minimize postoperative risks, and maintain therapeutic efficacy. The present study primarily focused on early complications and short-term results.

Methods: Fifty-six patients with a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 42 to 72 kg/m(2) were randomly assigned to either the SADI or BPD/DS procedure. Parameters compared included % excess weight loss (%EWL), % total weight loss (%TWL), length of hospital stay (LOS), re-admission rates, and complications.

Results: Both groups had similar demographics and baseline characteristics. SADI had a mean operating time of 109 min, significantly shorter than BPD/DS at 139 min (p < 0.001). Early complications occurred in five patients in the SADI group and in four patients in the BPD/DS group with no mortality. Median LOS was 2 days for both SADI and BPD/DS. Within 30 days, one SADI patient and three BPD/DS patients required re-admission. Serious late complications necessitating reoperation were observed in three SADI and two BPD/DS patients. After 1 year, %EWL and %TWL were similar: SADI (81.8% +/- 13.6% and 40.1% +/- 5.9%) and BPD/DS (84.2% +/- 14.0% and 41.6% +/- 6.4%).

Conclusion: This trial suggests that both the SADI and BPD/DS yield comparable weight loss outcomes after 1 year, with a notable risk profile.

Trial Registration: NCT 03938571 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)

BACKGROUND: The optimal sleeve diameter and distance from the pylorus to the edge of the resection line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remain controversial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of bougie size and antral resection distance from the pylorus on postoperative complications and weight-loss results in LSG.

SETTING: Nationwide registry-based study.

METHODS: This study included all LSGs performed in Sweden between 2012 and 2019. Data were obtained from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Reference bougie size of 35-36 Fr and an antral resection distance of 5 cm from the pylorus were compared to narrower bougie size (30-32 Fr), shorter distances (1-4 cm), and extended distances (6-8 cm) from the pylorus in assessing postoperative complications and weight loss as the outcomes of LSG. RESULTS: The study included 9,360 patients with postoperative follow-up rates of 96%, 79%, and 50% at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Narrow bougie and short antral resection distance from the pylorus were significantly associated with increased postoperative weight loss. Bougie size was not associated with increased early or late complications. However, short antral resection distance was associated with high risk of overall early complications [odds ratio: 1.46 (1.17-1.82, P = .001)], although no impact on late complications at 1 and 2 years was observed.

CONCLUSIONS: Using a narrow bougie and initiating resection closer to the pylorus were associated with greater maximum weight loss. Although a closer resection to the pylorus was associated with an increased risk of early postoperative complications, no association was observed with the use of narrow bougie for LSG.

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a primary bariatric procedure has gained increasing popularity world-wide. However, controversies still exist regarding several operative aspects, such as the optimal diameter of thesleeve and the optimal distance from the pylorus to the edge of the resection line, and whether these aspects haveeffects on weight-loss results and the risk to develop postoperative complications.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare weight-loss results and the incidence of postoperative complications betweensleeve with different diameters measured in bougie size and with different distances from the pylorus to the edge ofthe resection line measured in centimeter.

Setting: Nationwide registry-based study.

Method: This study is an analysis of sleeve gastrectomy performed in Sweden between 2012 and 2019. Data were collectedfrom Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). Patients with bougie size 30-32 and 35-36 and patients withdistance from pylorus 1-4 cm, 5 cm, 6-8 cm were identified and compared regarding weight-loss results and the riskto develop postoperative complications.

Results: 9,360 patients were included. Follow-up rate was 96% at day 30, 78.8% at one year and 50% at two years. Bothbougie size 30-32 compared to 35-36 and distance from the pylorus 1-4 cm compared to 5 cm were associated withsignificant higher weight-loss at one and two years. No difference in the risk for early or late complications was seenbetween bougie size groups 30-32 and 35-36. Resection starting 1-4 cm from the pylorus compared to 5 cm was as-sociated with higher risk for overall early postoperative complications (OR 1.46 (1.17-1.82, P=.001)), but there wasno significant difference in the risk to develop late complication at 1 and 2 years. No difference in the leak rate andin the risk to develop stricture was seen between different Bougie sizes, nor distances from the Pylorus.

Conclusion: Using a smaller Bougie size and starting the resection closer to the pylorus was associated with better maximumweight-loss. Closer resection to the Pylorus, but not Bougie size was associated with increased risk for early postop-erative complications after sleeve gastrectomy.