Open this publication in new window or tab >>Akvaplan-niva, Tromsø, Norway.
Akvaplan-niva, Tromsø, Norway.
Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Universit of Siena, Siena, Italy; Institute of Polar Sciences – National Research Council (ISP-CNR), Venice, Italy.
Institute of Polar Sciences – National Research Council (ISP-CNR), Venice, Italy.
Dalian Maritime University (DMU), Dalian, Peoples Republic of China; School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), Harbin, Peoples Republic of China.
School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), Harbin, Peoples Republic of China.
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Oslo, Norway.
Örebro University, School of Science and Technology. NILU-Climate and Environmental Institute, Kjeller, Norway.
Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson Arizona, USA.
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada.
Dept. of Environmental Science (ACES), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Faculty of Civil and Enviromental Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
Arctic Technology Dept., University Center in Svalbard (UNIS), Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway; Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Oslo, Norway.
School of Environmental Science, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (VET), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway.
Institute of Polar Sciences – National Research Council (ISP-CNR), Venice, Italy.
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Environmental Science: Advances, E-ISSN 2754-7000Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]
Arctic pollution has been a focal point in environmental research over the past five decades. Recently, the number of pollutants identified as relevant to the Arctic has significantly increased. Consequently, the expert group on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and Chemicals of Emerging Arctic Concern (CEACs) of the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) has prepared a series of assessments of contaminants in the Arctic, including influences of climate change. This review addresses local sources of Arctic organic pollutants associated with infrastructure in the Arctic. Industrial, military, and public infrastructures, including domestic installations, sewage treatment, solid waste management, and airports, were identified as significant local pollution sources. Additionally, operational emissions (e.g., from shipping, transportation, heating, and power production) contribute to the overall local pollution profile. Based on currently available scientific information, elevated POP and CEAC levels are mostly found in close proximity to identified local pollution sources. To date, hazardous effects have only been confirmed for a few selected chemicals, such as polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC) and certain pharmaceutical residues. However, studies are biased in the sense that they often focus on well-known contaminants, at a risk of overlooking CEAC and their effects. The review identifies several measures to reduce human impacts on local Arctic environments, including (i) using local indicator pollutants in ongoing national monitoring schemes, (ii) harmonizing emission reduction policies and licensing of industrial activities in the region to minimize exposure risks and environmental pollution, (iii) encouraging local municipalities, industries, and related stakeholders to coordinate their activities to minimize pollutant emissions.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Royal Society of Chemistry, 2025
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-125604 (URN)10.1039/d5va00261c (DOI)001629883500001 ()2-s2.0-105023571520 (Scopus ID)
2025-12-122025-12-122026-01-23Bibliographically approved