Sport is a setting where people learn and navigate ideals and norms related to the body and its impact on performance. These bodily ideals and norms are intrinsically linked to notions and stereotypes of gender (see, e.g., Giazitzoglu, 2024). Due to prevailing rules and traditions, most sports categorize athletes as either ‘female’ or ‘male’, implying that each sport involves staging a gendered body in relation to explicit rules or implicit norms.
Coaches play a crucial role in shaping and maintaining these bodily ideals and norms (e.g., Limstrand et al., 2024). As gatekeepers in elite athletes’ careers (Skrubbeltrang et al., 2021), their perceptions of what constitutes an optimal gendered body—in terms of weight, shape, and size—are highly influential. For example, research has shown that coaches have excluded athletes based on body shape and demanded extreme weight loss, arguing that it would enhance performance (Boudreault et al., 2022; McMahon, McGannon, & Palmer, 2022; Willson & Kerr, 2022). Such practices risk leading to body shaming, which can be counterproductive (Varea et al., 2024).
The literature on perceptions of athletes’ bodies has largely focused on women’s sports (e.g., Barker-Ruchti et al., 2017; McMahon, McGannon, & Palmer, 2022). It is often assumed that boys and men enjoy a broader range of accepted appearances and behaviours, given sport’s historical roots in masculinity. However, research on masculinity in sport has primarily emphasized masculine traits, rather than the masculine body and embodiment itself (Fasczewski et al., 2022; Wellard, 2009). It is therefore important to gain a deeper understanding of how masculine bodies are represented and regulated in sport. Raising awareness among key stakeholders such as coaches and club management can help to reduce the reproduction of gendered inequalities, harmful stereotypes, and counterproductive coaching practices, paving the way for more inclusive and sustainable athlete performance management.
This study aims to provide in-depth knowledge about how athletes are positioned as masculine gendered beings in elite sport, specifically in relation to norms surrounding the masculine body. Two research questions guide the study: To be positioned as a masculine gendered being in elite sport, (1) what is a body supposed to look like, and (2) how are athletes expected to relate to their bodies?
Focusing on the central role of the coach, we interviewed 12 Swedish youth elite coaches across 9 different sports about the role of body weight, shape, and size in their disciplines. Drawing on the concept of hegemonic masculinity (Connell, 2005), we use the notion of ‘imaginary positions’ (Wetherell & Edley, 1999) as our analytical lens, understood as different socially constructed ways of being a man. Exploring these positions empirically involves mapping patterns of ‘practical ideologies’ described by coaches and examining how these ideologies create conditions for what is (im)possible in sport.
We found that male athletes primarily navigate the following positions: The Performing Athlete, The Fit Athlete, The Ironic Athlete, The Social Athlete, and The Self-Regulated Athlete. Among these, the performing athlete and the fit athlete show the greatest potential for conflict, as conventional ideals of a fit physique do not always align with the demands of peak performance. While performance remains the central focus in elite sport, fully inhabiting the performing athlete position may require resisting the widely celebrated fit ideal.
Looking more broadly at the practical ideologies underlying these five positions, we recognize that they largely reinforce one another. This mutual reinforcement constrains the space male athletes have to define and embody their identities. In short, elite sport is not for every body. Exceptionally talented athletes may transcend these constraints, but meaningful change requires more than individual resistance - it calls for structural and cultural transformation (cf. Pederson et al., 2014).
Although elite sport is, by nature, selective, its exclusivity does not have to reinforce gendered inequalities. A critical rethinking of body ideals is essential for expanding opportunities for both male and female athletes, enabling a sporting culture where performance, diversity, and inclusivity can coexist, and where athletes feel safe, seen, and supported.