Airports are no longer merely transport infrastructures but have evolved into complex hospitality environments that shape how tourists experience mobility, destinations, and travel continuity (Wattanacharoensil et al., 2022). As gateways to regions and nations, airports influence not only operational efficiency but also destination attractiveness, airline choice, and outbound tourism behaviour (Prentice & Kadan, 2019). Tourists increasingly evaluate airports as experiential spaces where physical infrastructure, service encounters, and locally embedded hospitality practices interact to form expectations about places and journeys (Wattanacharoensil et al., 2017). In this context, online reviews function as behavioural signals through which tourists collectively assess and communicate the quality, legitimacy, and desirability of airport experiences. Yet, despite their growing importance for destination competitiveness and travel flows, airport research has largely prioritised economic efficiency, capacity, and commercial performance, paying comparatively little attention to how local culture, hospitality culture, and staff interactions operate as experienc escape componentsshaping tourist sentiment and loyalty behaviour (Pizam & Tasci, 2019; Wattanacharoensil et al., 2017). This study addresses this gap by examining how tourist sentiment expressed in online airport reviews translates into loyalty-related behaviour across culturally diverse regions and markets at different stages of maturity (Kumar et al., 2013; Tasci & Pizam, 2020). Airports are conceptualised as complex experiencescapes in which physical infrastructure, social interaction, and culturally embedded service practices jointly shape tourist behaviour. Building on servicescape and experiencescape research (Mossberg, 2007; Pizam & Tasci, 2019; Wattanacharoensil et al., 2022), the study positions hospitality culture and frontline staff behaviour as central but under‑researched components of the airport experience environment.
Empirically, the study analyses 258,754 online airport reviews collected from both specialist and generalist platforms across Europe, the United States, Africa, and a mixed global sample. Using sentiment analysis, thematic tagging of experience dimensions, and predictive modelling, the study examines how sentiment relates to loyalty indicators such as recommendation and high-rating behaviour. Comparative analyses reveal that while sentiment reliably predicts loyalty across all contexts, its intensity, polarity, and thematic grounding vary systematically by region and platform, reflecting culturally embedded norms of emotional expression and differing market conditions.
A key finding is that staff interactions and hospitality culture emerge as the dominant drivers of both positive and negative sentiment across all regions, regardless of market maturity or platform type. This indicates that even in highly infrastructural and time-pressured environments, tourist behaviour is disproportionately shaped by interpersonal treatment rather than by physical facilities alone. These findings align with prior research emphasising the role of emotional experience in shaping satisfaction and recommendation behaviour (Prayag et al., 2017) and extend airport studies that acknowledge service quality but rarely theorise its cultural and behavioural mechanisms (Bogicevic et al., 2013; Saut & Song, 2022; Wattanacharoensil et al., 2022).
By integrating cross-cultural comparison with differences in market maturity, this study contributes to tourism consumer behaviour and airport research by demonstrating that local culture and hospitality culture function as behavioural levers within airport experiencescapes (Tasci & Pizam, 2020). The findings suggest that airport competitiveness and destination connectivity increasingly depend on how terminals are designed not only for efficiency but also for culturally appropriate service interaction (Wattanacharoensil et al., 2022). For airports, destinations, and DMOs, the results highlight that investments in hospitality culture and frontline staff design are central to shaping tourist sentiment, loyalty signals, and digital reputation in platform-mediated travel markets.
References:
Bogicevic, V., Yang, W., Bilgihan, A., & Bujisic, M. (2013). Airport service quality drivers of passenger satisfaction. Tourism Review, 68(4), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-09-2013-0047
Kumar, V., Pozza, I. D., & Ganesh, J. (2013). Revisiting the satisfaction-loyalty relationship: Empirical generalizations and directions for future research. Journal of Retailing, 89(3), 246–262.
Mossberg, L. (2007). A Marketing Approach to the Tourist Experience. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250701231915
Pizam, A., & Tasci, A. D. A. (2019). Experienscape: expanding the concept of servicescape with a multi-stakeholder and multi-disciplinary approach (invited paper for ‘luminaries’ special issue of International Journal of Hospitality Management). International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 25–37.
Prayag, G., Hosany, S., Muskat, B., & Del Chiappa, G. (2017). Understanding the Relationships between Tourists’ Emotional Experiences, Perceived Overall Image, Satisfaction, and Intention to Recommend. Journal of Travel Research, 56(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515620567
Prentice, C., & Kadan, M. (2019). The role of airport service quality in airport and destination choice. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.006
Saut, M., & Song, V. (2022). Influences of airport service quality, satisfaction, and image on behavioral intention towards destination visit. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 10(1), 82–109.https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2054857
Tasci, A. D. A., & Pizam, A. (2020). An expanded nomological network of experiencescape .International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(3), 999–1040.
Wattanacharoensil, W., Fakfare, P., & Graham, A. (2022). Airportscape and its effect on airport sense of place and destination image perception. Tourism Review, 77(2), 549–569.https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-01-2021-0036
Wattanacharoensil, W., Schuckert, M., Graham, A., & Dean, A. (2017). An analysis of the airport experience from an air traveler perspective. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 32, 124–135.