Introduction: This pilot study investigated how food service management (FSM) students comprehend the need for a thorough understanding the importance of to whom the food is being prepared and in which context, but also how ethical and sustainable aspects can be emphasised in meal planning and production. The Conscious Meal Model (CMM) was used to support FSM students’ development as professionals. The model broadens the meal's perspective and considers the guest's wishes, needs, preferences and conditions regarding meal consumption, in private and public meal sectors (Magnusson Sporre, 2015). Meal planning should also be permeated by ethical perspectives, operationalized in a way so that the FSM students can see the connections between ethical viewpoints and requirements of sustainable meal production practice. For reaching this aim, the consciousness in meal planning and production, as depicted in the CMM model, has a key role.
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate how FSM students define criteria in meal planning and production according to the CMM.
Method & Design: The central standpoint for designing the learning task was to enable critical thinking and support experimental mind-set needed at the university level of studies. Students (n = 12) worked in four groups of three to define and motivate criteria in four food service areas: three public meal settings—schools, hospitals, and elderly care—and one private lunch canteen. Each context provided one workstation, which the groups visited independently and added ideas based on the previous groups’ ideas. The authors designed a rotating workstation method (RWM), inspired of the various team learning methods. The method includes exploring ideas and processes, discussing differences, and resolving them to co-construct new understanding (Lehmann-Willenbrock, 2017). The RWM-method provided data on four separate handwritten sheets, including 119 units of analysis, which were analysed with qualitative content analysis.
Results: The students noted the various power relations related to food choice and quality in hospitals, schools and elderly care as poor and in private canteen restaurants as high. Issues related to ethics and sustainable were challenging, yet different, in all four contexts. These issues remained abstract, showing how important it is to use models (e.g. the CMM) and to operationalise what ethical and sustainable meal production means in different food service practices.
Conclusion: Both the private and public sector meal planners must have solid education to be able to meet the contemporary demands and act wisely in the changing societal environment also in the future. The CMM helped students realise the complexities of food service. When the students use the CMM, they got a tool which provide them to work in a structured way, and they can problematize around different issues in the meal planning and production process. CMM and RWM have their potential as pedagogical tools not only in FSM education, but also in other areas of gastronomy and hospitality education. By supporting the students’ ability to apply and discuss theoretical concepts in their study programmes, they will be prepared to meet food service needs in contemporary times, and to be fit for the future.
References:
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2017). Team learning: New insights through a temporal lens. Small Group Research, 48(2), 123–130.
Magnusson Sporre, C. (2015). Måltidsgörarens utmaningar: Komplexiteten i det medvetna måltidsgörandet (Örebro Studies in Culinary Arts and Meal Science, 11). Örebro: Örebro University.