To Örebro University

BACKGROUND: Missing nursing care in the perioperative context affects quality of care and patient safety. More validated language versions of the MISSCARE Survey OR enable local, national, and international comparisons. The aim was to translate and culturally adapt the American MISSCARE Survey OR to the Swedish perioperative context and assess the instrument's psychometric properties.

METHODS: A cross-sectional validation study with translation and cultural adaptation was conducted in eight steps according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines. To assess the psychometric properties, data were collected via a web survey distributed at a Swedish national conference for operating room nurses. The data collection was concluded in November 2023. Acceptability, construct validity and internal consistency were analyzed.

RESULTS: Cultural adaptation resulted in the omission of two items from the section measuring missed elements of care. A total of 107 (out of 261 invited operating room nurses) respondents were included in the psychometric testing, leading to a response rate of 41%. Acceptability was high, and 95.3% of the respondents answered all the items. The factor analysis on missed elements of care was inconclusive and was therefore regarded as a list of nursing actions. With respect to reasons for missed nursing care, the factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution, which explained a cumulative variance of 62.6%. The alpha coefficients for internal consistency for the three factors ranged from 0.760 to 0.947.

CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish MISSCARE Survey OR is a valid instrument with sufficient psychometric properties and provides a reliable measure of missed nursing care and its reasons. Usage could be valuable for nursing managers and directors, who are responsible for care processes and strategic care planning.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are a significant threat to patient safety. Shoulder arthroplasty carries an increased risk due to foreign implants. Skin preparation in general is a key preoperative preventive intervention, and the use of chlorhexidine can have a prolonged effect on bacterial colonisation. There is a lack of evidence regarding whether postoperative disinfection has an impact on bacterial colonisation during the first 48 hours after surgery. Our hypothesis was that applying postoperative antiseptic with 5 mg/ml chlorhexidine in 70% ethanol would lead to reduced bacterial colonisation with Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococcus and Cutibacterium acnes around the surgical wound within the initial 48 hours after elective shoulder surgery, compared with the use of sodium chloride.

METHODS: A single-blinded, controlled study was conducted at a county hospital in Sweden. Swabs from the skin were collected four times: at baseline, preoperatively, after the intervention and after 48 hours.

RESULTS: Our hypothesis was not confirmed. Although not statistically significant, the chlorhexidine group had a higher prevalence of bacterial colonisation of clinically relevant bacteria.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study could not confirm that postoperative disinfection with chlorhexidine reduces bacterial colonisation compared with sodium chloride. The results highlight the complexity of SSIs and the importance of evidence-based preventive skin preparation to ensure patient safety. Further research is needed, considering the study's limitations, to explore and evaluate the effectiveness of different skin cleansing solutions and preventive strategies in diverse surgical contexts.

BACKGROUND: Writing a bachelor thesis has a central role in nursing education. Nursing students require both information and academic literacy in order to write their theses, and there is an expectation that these skills will contribute to putting their knowledge into practice.

OBJECTIVES: To describe students' perceptions of the student and supervisor roles and to investigate students' experienced self-efficacy during the supervision of their bachelor thesis.

DESIGN: A cross-sectional pre-post design.

SETTINGS: Four universities were included. All four had bachelor thesis courses organized as a group supervision process, with a student active approach. Nursing students met together one hour prior to meeting with their supervisor, in order to discuss concerns, try to solve upcoming problems, and plan the agenda for the upcoming supervision session.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 472 undergraduate nursing students were invited to participate.

METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was used, incorporating the Supervision of Thesis Questionnaire and the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Data were collected at two points: before and after the thesis course. Descriptive statistics and frequencies were calculated, and the independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analytic analysis.

RESULTS: The response rate was 39 % (160/472) pre-course and 28 % (130/472) post-course. Nursing students had high expectations of supervision at both time points. Students reporting high self-efficacy had higher expectations of the supervisor's knowledge of the subject and the methods, compared to those reporting lower self-efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS: Nursing students reported high expectations for the supervision process, the supervisor, and themselves, both when entering and when ending the bachelor thesis course. Self-efficacy may contribute to these expectations. Active learning in a group (i.e., collaborative learning) may contribute to nursing students' commitment during the group supervision process in a bachelor thesis course. Further studies are warranted on the optimal group composition to support learning during bachelor thesis courses.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection after saphenous vein harvest is common, with reported leg wound infection rates ranging from 2 to 24%. There have been few investigations into sex-related differences in complication rates. Moreover, varied effects of smoking have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors such as gender and smoking, associated with surgical site infection after vein graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

METHODS: We included 2,188 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with at least one vein graft at our centre from 2009 to 2018. All patients were followed up postoperatively. Risk factors for leg wound infection requiring antibiotic treatment and surgical revision were analysed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: In total, 374 patients (17.1%) received antibiotic treatment and 154 (7.0%) underwent surgical revision for leg wound infection at the harvest site. Female sex, high body mass index, diabetes mellitus, longer operation time, peripheral vascular disease and direct oral anticoagulants were independently associated with any leg wound infection at the harvest site. Among surgically revised patients, female sex and insulin or oral treatment for diabetes mellitus as well as longer operation time were independent risk factors. Smoking was not associated with leg wound infection.

CONCLUSION: Female sex is associated with increased risk of leg wound infection. The underlying mechanism is unknown. In the current population, previous or current smoking was not associated with an increased risk of leg wound infection.

Introduction

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most common cardiac surgery throughout the world. The most commonly used graft is the saphenous vein. Wound healing complications related to saphenous vein harvesting are common, with reported surgical site infection rates ranging from 2% to 20%. Surgical site infection can be long-lasting, and the wound healing can be difficult and also presumably troublesome for the patient. CABG patients’ experiences of severe infection in the harvesting site have not been studied before.Aim: The aim of this study was to describe patients’ experiences associated with acquiring a severe infection in the harvesting site after CABG.

Method A qualitative study with descriptive design was conducted at the department of vascular and cardiothoracic surgery in a Swedish university hospital from May to December 2018. Patients diagnosed with a severe surgical site infection in the harvesting site following CABG were included. Data from 16 face-to-face interviews were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis.

Result The main category, varying impact on body and mind, was the core of the patients’ experiences of severe wound infection in the harvesting site after CABG. Two generic categories were identified: physical impact and thoughts about the complication. The patients described experiencing different degrees of pain, anxiety, and limitation in daily life.

Conclusion These findings indicate that a severe infection in the harvesting site after CABG was experienced as an important issue with varying impact. Overall, the participants experienced pain, anxiety, and limitations in daily life. However, most of them were satisfied with the outcome after the wound had healed. Patients should be advised to seek care at an early stage if symptoms of infection occur. Improved individual pain management is needed for those with severe pain, and varied experiences imply a need for person-centred care.

The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Swedish operating room version of PUKAT 2.0. In total, 284 Swedish operating room nurses completed the survey of whom 50 completed the retest. The item difficulty P-value of 14 items ranged between 0.38 and 0.96 (median 0.65). Three items were found to be too easy (0.90-0.96). The D-value of 14 items ranged between 0.00 and 0.42 (median 0.46). Three items had a D-value lower than 0.20 (0.11-0.16) and eight items scored higher than 0.40 (0.45-0.61). The quality of the response alternatives (a-value) ranged between 0.00 and 0.42. This showed that nurses with a master's degree had a higher knowledge than nurses with a professional degree (respectively 9.4/14 versus 8.6/14; t = -2.4, df = 199, P = 0.02). The ICC was 0.65 (95% CI 0.45-0.78). The ICCs for the domains varied from 0.12 (95% CI = -0.16-0.39) to 0.59 (95% CI = 0.38-0.75). Results indicated that 11 of the original items contributed to the overall validity. However, the low participation in the test-retest made the reliability of the instrument low. An extended evaluation with a larger sample should be considered in order to confirm aspects of the psychometric properties of this instrument.

PURPOSE: To systematically summarize and review the existing literature to determine the difference between wound cleansing techniques, irrigation and swabbing, in relation to bleeding, pain, infection, necrotic tissue and exudate in non-infected chronic wounds including pressure injuries, venous and arterial leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.

METHODS: A systematic search of the electronic databases Ovid Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EMBASE was performed to identify all relevant literature in English. The search also included systematic reviews as a method to obtain additional potential citations by manually searching the reference lists. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

RESULTS: One study met eligibility criteria. Two hundred fifty six patients with wounds healing via secondary intention (n = 256) were included. Wound cleansing via swabbing technique was associated with increased perception of pain and increased rates of infection when compared to the irrigation group (93.4% versus 84.2% p = 0.02 and 5.2% versus 3.3% p = 0.44, respectively). Only a small proportion of this sample met the inclusion criteria, so the results are not considered externally valid.

CONCLUSION: Wound cleansing remains a controversial topic. Despite calls for further research, there continues to remain a large gap in evidence to guide practice. Irrigation continues to replace swabbing in the management of chronic wounds, although evidence of improved outcomes is virtually nonexistent. Although the one study identified was of sound methodological quality, chronic wounds accounted for only a small percentage of the sample. Therefore, results are not generalizable to those with chronic wounds. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of basic wound cleansing techniques before considering more costly products.

Background: The aim of this study was to explore interventions that Swedish operating room (OR) nurses considered important for the prevention of bacterial contamination and surgical site infections (SSIs).

Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey with an open-ended question was answered by OR nurses and analyzed using summative content analysis and descriptive statistics.

Results:The OR nurses (n=890) worked within 11 surgical specialties and most of them worked at university hospitals (37%) or county hospitals (53%). The nurses described twelve important interventions to prevent bacterial contamination and SSI: skin disinfection (25.9%), the OR environment (18.2%), aseptic technique (16.4%), OR clothes (13.4%), draping (9.8%), preparation (6.1%), dressing (3.6%), basic hygiene (3.4%), normothermia (2.1%), communication (0.7%), knowledge (0.3%), and work strategies (0.2%).

Discussion: Skin disinfection was considered the most important intervention in order to prevent bacterial contamination and SSI. The responses indicated that many nurses believed the patients’ skin to be sterile after the skin disinfection process. This is not a certainty, but skin disinfection does significantly decrease the amount of bacterial growth.

Conclusions: This study shows that many OR nurses' interventions are in line with recommendations. Although, knowledge regarding the effect of skin disinfection needs further research and continued education.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review recommendations for promoting and maintaining skin integrity in end-of-life care and their level of evidence.

DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (PubMed interface), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched using a combination of key terms including end-of-life care, skin care, skin hygiene, and skin cleansing.

STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if they (1) described skin care recommendations, including but not limited to the use of skin care products and interventions such as cleansing procedures; and (2) included adult patients who were expected to die within 12 months. There were no restrictions on study design, study setting, or language. Articles with a publication date before 2000 were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION: Two data extraction forms were developed. The first included information about the author, publication year, type of evidence, study topic, sample, sample size, setting, limitations of the study, level of evidence, and quality of the study. The second included recommendations for promoting and maintaining skin integrity in patients at the end of life.

DATA SYNTHESIS: Because of methodological heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively, and no meta-analysis was performed.

CONCLUSIONS: The information contained in the recommendations will assist nurses in promoting and maintaining skin integrity in patients at the end of life. More research is needed on end-of-life skin care, with an emphasis on patient-centered, holistic strategies that improve patient well-being and quality of life. In most current research, recommendations are limited to literature reviews and level V evidence. Skin care must balance the promotion and maintenance of skin integrity, wound prevention, and management while promoting patient dignity and quality of life.

Introduction: To assess operating room (OR) nurses' attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention, the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APuP) instrument was developed.

Aim: The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APuP) instrument in a Swedish OR context.

Materials and methods: A psychometric evaluation study was conducted, using a convenience sample, between February and August 2020. Validity (content, construct, discriminatory power) and reliability (stability and internal consistency) were evaluated.

Results: The first survey (test) was completed by 284 Swedish OR nurses, of whom n = 50 (17.6%) completed the second survey (retest). A Principal Component Analysis was conducted for the 13-item instrument. The KMO value for this model was 0.62. Bartlett's test for sphericity was statistically significant (p 0.001). Five factors were identified which accounted for 56% of the variance in responses related to attitudes toward pressure ulcer prevention. The Cronbach's α for the instrument "attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention" was 0.66. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.49 (95% CI = 0.25-0.67).

Conclusion: This Swedish version of the APuP- OR is the first step in the development of an instrument to measure OR nurses' attitudes towards PU prevention in a Swedish OR context. The reliability of the instrument was low and the validity moderate. A larger sample and the revision or addition of items related to the context of the operating room should be considered in order to confirm aspects of the psychometric properties.