To Örebro University

OBJECTIVES: Optimal antibiotic treatment is important in the treatment of sepsis. However, patients with sepsis are at risk of suboptimal antibiotic concentrations. This study aimed to evaluate β-lactam antibiotic concentrations during the first 48 h in patients with community-acquired sepsis admitted to the ICU, and to identify variables associated with antibiotic concentrations that were too low or too high.

METHODS: This prospective, observational, single-centre study included patients aged ≥18 years with a high likelihood of infection, a SOFA score of ≥2p, planned β-lactam antibiotic treatment, and ICU admission. The exclusion criteria were ongoing antibiotic treatment and/or nosocomial infections. β-Lactam concentrations were measured up to seven times during the first 48 h. The estimated trough concentrations were divided by the predetermined MIC to generate MIC-multiples for comparison. Patients were allocated to three groups based on the MIC-multiple (MIC× < 1, 1-8 or >8).

RESULTS: Fifty patients were included, with a median of seven samples per patient (257 samples). The group with MIC-multiples of <1 (n = 16) was associated with younger age, lower Charlson comorbidity index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, creatinine concentration, and need for noradrenaline. The group with MIC-multiples of >8 (n = 15) had higher creatinine and noradrenaline levels.

CONCLUSIONS: ICU patients with sepsis are at risk of either too low or too high antibiotic concentrations, and specific patient characteristics may be predictable. Therapeutic drug monitoring in combination with model-informed precision dosing may also help to optimize antibiotic dosing in the early phase of community-acquired sepsis to prevent treatment failure and toxicity.

Natural and semi-synthetic cannabinoid analogs are getting increasing media attention for their recreative use as an alternative to traditional cannabis, in Sweden as well as internationally. To investigate an increasing number of urine samples incoming to our clinical laboratory that were screening positive, using a CEDIA THC-COOH immunoassay from ThermoFisher Scientific, but then testing negative using GC-MS based verification analysis, we developed an LC-MS/MS-method for verification of hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) and Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol. Assessment of HHC intake was based on identification of the following four metabolites: 11-nor-9(R)-carboxy-hexahydrocannabinol (R-HHC-COOH), 11-nor-9(S)-carboxy-hexahydrocannabinol (S-HHC-COOH), 11-hydroxy-9(R)-hexahydrocannabinol (R-HHC-OH) and 11-hydroxy-9(S)-hexahydrocannabinol (S-HHC-OH). Out of 46 urine samples analysed in this study, 44 showed presence of HHC-metabolites, which indicate HHC as the main explanation for an increased number of negative verifications for THC-COOH. In these samples, the HHC-OH metabolites occurred at a higher concentration than R-HHC-COOH while S-HHC-COOH was only detected in few samples at low concentrations. R-HHC-COOH and S-HHC-COOH can easily be added to a pre-existing verification method for THC-COOH, and still show acceptable results, while HHC-OH requires an enzyme capable of hydrolysing the ether glucuronide bond.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is threatening the gonorrhoea treatment, and optimizations of the current ceftriaxone-treatment regimens are crucial. We evaluated the pharmacodynamics of ceftriaxone single-dose therapy (0.125-1 g) against ceftriaxone-susceptible and ceftriaxone-resistant gonococcal strains, based on EUCAST ceftriaxone-resistance breakpoint (MIC > 0.125 mg/L), in our hollow fibre infection model (HFIM) for gonorrhoea.

METHODS: Gonococcal strains examined were WHO F (ceftriaxone-susceptible, MIC < 0.002 mg/L), R (ceftriaxone-resistant, MIC = 0.5 mg/L), Z (ceftriaxone-resistant, MIC = 0.5 mg/L) and X (ceftriaxone-resistant, MIC = 2 mg/L). Dose-range HFIM 7 day experiments simulating ceftriaxone 0.125-1 g single-dose intramuscular regimens were conducted.

RESULTS: Ceftriaxone 0.125-1 g single-dose treatments rapidly eradicated WHO F (wild-type ceftriaxone MIC). Ceftriaxone 0.5 and 1 g treatments, based on ceftriaxone human plasma pharmacokinetic parameters, eradicated most ceftriaxone-resistant gonococcal strains (WHO R and Z), but ceftriaxone 0.5 g failed to eradicate WHO X (high-level ceftriaxone resistance). When simulating oropharyngeal gonorrhoea, ceftriaxone 0.5 g failed to eradicate all the ceftriaxone-resistant strains, while ceftriaxone 1 g eradicated WHO R and Z (low-level ceftriaxone resistance) but failed to eradicate WHO X (high-level ceftriaxone resistance). No ceftriaxone-resistant mutants were selected using any ceftriaxone treatments.

CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone 1 g single-dose intramuscularly cure most of the anogenital and oropharyngeal gonorrhoea cases caused by the currently internationally spreading ceftriaxone-resistant gonococcal strains, which should be further confirmed clinically. A ceftriaxone 1 g dose (±azithromycin 2 g) should be recommended for first-line empiric gonorrhoea treatment. This will buy countries some time until novel antimicrobials are licensed. Using ceftriaxone 1 g gonorrhoea treatment, the EUCAST ceftriaxone-resistance breakpoint is too low.

Antimicrobial resistance in the sexually transmitted bacterium Neisseria gonorrhoeae is compromising the management and control of gonorrhea globally. Optimized use and enhanced stewardship of current antimicrobials and development of novel antimicrobials are imperative. The first in class zoliflodacin (spiropyrimidinetrione, DNA Gyrase B inhibitor) is a promising novel antimicrobial in late-stage clinical development for gonorrhea treatment, i.e., the phase III randomized controlled clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03959527) was recently finalized, and zoliflodacin showed non-inferiority compared to the recommended ceftriaxone plus azithromycin dual therapy. Doxycycline, the first-line treatment for chlamydia and empiric treatment for non-gonococcal urethritis, will be frequently given together with zoliflodacin because gonorrhea and chlamydia coinfections are common. In a previous static in vitro study, it was indicated that doxycycline/tetracycline inhibited the gonococcal killing of zoliflodacin in 6-h time-kill curve analysis. In this study, our dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) was used to investigate combination therapies with zoliflodacin and doxycycline. Dose-range experiments using the three gonococcal strains WHO F (susceptible to relevant therapeutic antimicrobials), WHO X (extensively drug-resistant, including ceftriaxone-resistant; zoliflodacin-susceptible), and SE600/18 (zoliflodacin-susceptible strain with GyrB S467N substitution) were conducted simulating combination therapy with a single oral dose of zoliflodacin 0.5-4 g combined with a doxycycline daily oral dose of 200 mg administered as 100 mg twice a day, for 7 days (standard dose for chlamydia treatment). Comparing combination therapy of zoliflodacin (0.5-4 g single dose) plus doxycycline (200 mg divided into 100 mg twice a day orally, for 7 days) to zoliflodacin monotherapy (0.5-4 g single dose) showed that combination therapy was slightly more effective than monotherapy in the killing of N. gonorrhoeae and suppressing emergence of zoliflodacin resistance. Accordingly, WHO F was eradicated by only 0.5 g single dose of zoliflodacin in combination with doxycycline, and WHO X and SE600/18 were both eradicated by a 2 g single dose of zoliflodacin in combination with doxycycline; no zoliflodacin-resistant populations occurred during the 7-day experiment when using this zoliflodacin dose. When using suboptimal (0.5-1 g) zoliflodacin doses together with doxycycline, gonococcal mutants with increased zoliflodacin MICs, due to GyrB D429N and the novel GyrB T472P, emerged, but both the mutants had an impaired biofitness. The present study shows the high efficacy of zoliflodacin plus doxycycline combination therapy using a dynamic HFIM that more accurately and comprehensively simulate gonococcal infection and their treatment, i.e., compared to static in vitro models, such as short-time checkerboard experiments or time-kill curve analysis. Based on our dynamic in vitro HFIM work, zoliflodacin plus doxycycline for the treatment of both gonorrhea and chlamydia can be an effective combination.

The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is seriously threatening the treatment and control of gonorrhea globally. Novel treatment options are essential, coupled with appropriate methods to pharmacodynamically examine the efficacy and resistance emergence of these novel drugs. Herein, we used our dynamic in vitro hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) to evaluate protein-unbound lefamulin, a semisynthetic pleuromutilin, against N. gonorrhoeae. Dose-range and dose-fractionation experiments with N. gonorrhoeae reference strains: WHO F (susceptible to all relevant antimicrobials), WHO X (extensively drug-resistant, including ceftriaxone resistance), and WHO V (high-level azithromycin resistant, and highest gonococcal MIC of lefamulin (2 mg/l) reported), were performed to examine lefamulin gonococcal killing and resistance development during treatment. The dose-range experiments, simulating a single oral dose of lefamulin based on human plasma concentrations, indicated that ≥1.2 g, ≥2.8 g, and ≥9.6 g of lefamulin were required to eradicate WHO F, X, and V, respectively. Dose-fractionation experiments, based on human lefamulin plasma concentrations, showed that WHO X was eradicated with ≥2.8 g per day when administered as q12 h (1.4 g twice a day) and with ≥3.6 g per day when administered as q8 h (1.2 g thrice a day), both for 7 days. However, when simulating the treatment with 5-10 times higher concentrations of free lefamulin in relevant gonorrhea tissues (based on urogenital tissues in a rat model), 600 mg every 12 h for 5 days (approved oral treatment for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia) eradicated all strains, and no lefamulin resistance emerged in the successful treatment arms. In many arms failing single or multiple dose treatments for WHO X, lefamulin-resistant mutants (MIC = 2 mg/l), containing an A132V amino acid substitution in ribosomal protein L3, were selected. Nevertheless, these lefamulin-resistant mutants demonstrated an impaired biofitness. In conclusion, a clinical study is warranted to elucidate the clinical potential of lefamulin as a treatment option for uncomplicated gonorrhea (as well as several other bacterial STIs).

Novel antimicrobials for effective treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea are essential, and the first-in-class, oral spiropyrimidinetrione DNA gyrase B inhibitor zoliflodacin appears promising. Using our newly developed Hollow Fiber Infection Model (HFIM), the pharmacodynamics of zoliflodacin was examined. A clinical zoliflodacin-susceptible N. gonorrhoeae strain, SE600/18 (harbouring a GyrB S467N amino acid substitution; MIC = 0.25 mg/L), and SE600/18-D429N (zoliflodacin-resistant mutant with a second GyrB substitution, D429N, selected in the HFIM experiments; zoliflodacin MIC = 2 mg/L), were examined. Dose-range experiments, simulating zoliflodacin single oral dose regimens of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 g, were performed for SE600/18. For SE600/18-D429N, dose-range experiments, simulating zoliflodacin single oral 2, 3, 4, and 6 g doses, and zoliflodacin oral dose-fractionation experiments with 4, 6, and 8 g administered as q12 h were performed. Both strains grew well in the untreated HFIM growth control arms and mostly maintained growth at 10¹⁰-10¹¹ CFU/ml for 7 days. Zoliflodacin 3 and 4 g single dose oral regimens successfully eradicated SE600/18 and no growth was recovered during the 7-days experiments. However, the single oral 0.5, 1, and 2 g doses failed to eradicate SE600/18, and zoliflodacin-resistant populations with a GyrB D429N substitution were selected with all these doses. The zoliflodacin-resistant SE600/18-D429N mutant was not eradicated with any examined treatment regimen. However, this in vitro-selected zoliflodacin-resistant mutant was substantially less fit compared to the zoliflodacin-susceptible SE600/18 parent strain. In conclusion, the rare clinical gonococcal strains with GyrB S467N substitution are predisposed to develop zoliflodacin resistance and may require treatment with zoliflodacin ≥3 g. Future development may need to consider the inclusion of diagnostics directed at identifying strains resistant or predisposed to resistance development at a population level and to strengthen surveillance (phenotypically and genetically), and possibly also at the patient level to guide treatment.

Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is threatening the treatment and control of gonorrhea globally, and new treatment options are imperative. Utilizing our dynamic in vitro hollow fiber infection model (HFIM), we examined the pharmacodynamics of the first-in-class spiropyrimidinetrione (DNA gyrase B inhibitors), zoliflodacin, against the N. gonorrhoeae reference strains World Health Organization F (susceptible to all relevant antimicrobials) and WHO X (extensively drug resistant, including resistance to ceftriaxone) over 7 days. Dose-range experiments with both strains, simulating zoliflodacin single oral dose regimens of 0.5-8 g, and dose-fractionation experiments with WHO X, simulating zoliflodacin oral dose therapy with 1-4 g administered as q12 h and q8 h for 24 h, were performed. A kill-rate constant that reflected a rapid bacterial kill during the first 6.5 h for both strains and all zoliflodacin doses was identified. In the dose-range experiments, the zoliflodacin 2-8 g single-dose treatments successfully eradicated both WHO strains, and resistance to zoliflodacin was not observed. However, zoliflodacin as a single 0.5 g dose failed to eradicate both WHO strains, and a 1 g single dose failed to eradicate WHO X in one of two experiments. The zoliflodacin 1 g/day regimen also failed to eradicate WHO X when administered as two and three divided doses given at q12 h and q8 h in the dose-fractionation studies, respectively. All failed regimens selected for zoliflodacin-resistant mutants. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that zoliflodacin should be administered at >2 g as a single oral dose to provide effective killing and resistance suppression of N. gonorrhoeae. Future studies providing pharmacokinetic data for zoliflodacin (and other gonorrhea therapeutic antimicrobials) in urogenital and extragenital infection sites, particularly in the pharynx, and evaluation of gonococcal strains with different gyrB mutations would be important.