Till Örebro universitet

Background: Depth of invasion (DOI) is important for the T-classification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue (SCCOT) and incorporated in the TNM 8 classification of oral cavity cancer. To determine DOI clinical palpation is performed, but the preferred radiological modality remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the assessment of DOI using ultrasound (US-DOI).

Methods: The DOI was assessed in 40 patients with T1-T3 SCCOT by ultrasound, palpation, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Histopathological DOI (H-DOI) was gold standard. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). Results The mean difference of US-DOI was -0.5 mm (95% LOA -4.9-4.0) compared to H-DOI and the mean difference for MRI was 3.9 mm (95% LOA -2.3-10.2). In the subgroup analysis of cT1-T2 the US-DOI mean difference was 0.1 mm and the 95% LOA limits -2.5-2.7.

Conclusions: Ultrasound seems to be the most accurate method to assess DOI in T1-T2 SCCOT. MRI overestimates DOI and cannot assess a substantial proportion of the tumors. Level of Evidence 2c.

BACKGROUND: In surgical resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue (SCCOT), achieving clear margins is important for prognosis. Insufficient histopathological margins are common, particularly deep margins.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine whether ultrasound (US)-assisted resection could decrease the proportion of insufficient histopathological deep margins in SCCOT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: 34 patients with SCCOT undergoing US-assisted resection (study group) were compared to 76 whose resections were performed without US (conventional group). Outcome measures were insufficient deep histopathological resection margins and mean difference in deep margins.

RESULTS: Insufficient deep resection margins (<5.0 mm) were seen in 8 of 34 (23.5%) in the study group, compared to 31 of 76 (40.8%) in the conventional group, unadjusted RR 0.58 [95% CI 0.30-1.12; p = .11], adjusted RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.35-1.92; p = .64]. Unadjusted mean difference was 1.4 mm (95% CI 0.1-2.7, p = .04), adjusted mean difference 1.1 mm (95% CI -2.7 to 0.5, p = .19).

CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative US can visualize the deep resection margins in T1/T2 SCCOT. US-assisted resection seems to decrease the number of insufficient histopathological deep margins, though the results are not statistically significant. Comparatively good results in the conventional group is one explanation for the lack of significance.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT04059861.

BACKGROUND: In oral cancers, tumour borders are typically defined by white light (WL). Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique commonly used for the larynx and for cancers of unknown primary. However, evidence for using NBI in oral cancers is insufficient.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether NBI is a better predictor of the true mucosal tumour borders than WL in oral cancers. Additionally, we examined the agreement between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and pathology reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, the tumour borders were assessed by both NBI and WL at the time of surgical resection and then compared. Pathology reports of the examined areas were used as gold standard.

RESULTS: Forty-nine participants were included. After exclusion of 15 patients due to missing data, 34 were included in analyses. In 26.5% of the assessments, the tumour borders defined by NBI were outside the borders defined by WL. However, 55.5% of these were false-positives.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The delineation of mucosal tumour borders in oral cancers by NBI was not better than that by WL in this study. Several methodological challenges may have influenced the findings of this study, similar to the limitations reported in previous studies.

Surgery is the first line of treatment in gingival cancers of the mandible, and bone resection is necessary in the majority of cases. In the less extensive surgical option, marginal mandibulectomy (MM), the mandibular base is preserved. In contrast, in a segmental mandibulectomy (SM) the mandible is divided and the continuity is not preserved. If MM can be performed with comparable oncological results to SM, it is the preferred method. The aim of the present study was to identify preoperative predictors for local recurrence (LR), to support the selection of candidates for MM. Outcome measures were local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and disease specific survival (DSS). 67 patients treated with MM between 2008 and 2021 were included. Cox regression analyses of LR with hazard ratios and adjustments for postoperative radiotherapy, pathological T-stage (pT) and soft tissue margins were performed. 5-years LRFS was 63% (95% CI 46.9-75.5) and DSS 80.6% (95% CI 64.7-89.9). In conclusion we found that edentulous patients, more advanced pT-stage and positive soft tissue margins had increased risk for LR. Future studies of the correlation between cT and pT would be important to provide more robust preoperative support in the selection between MM and SM.