To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of extreme ritual practices on psychophysiological well-being
Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT, United States.
School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7048-9786
Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, United States; Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion (LEVYNA), Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion (LEVYNA), Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Current Anthropology, ISSN 0011-3204, E-ISSN 1537-5382, Vol. 60, no 5, p. 699-707Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Extreme ritual practices involving pain and suffering pose significant risks such as injury, trauma, or infection. Nonetheless, they are performed by millions of people around the world and are often culturally prescribed remedies for a variety of maladies, and especially those related to mental health. What is the actual impact of these practices on health? Combining ethnographic observations and psychophysiological monitoring, we investigated outcomes of participation in one of the world's most extreme rituals, involving bodily mutilation and prolonged suffering. Performance of this physically demanding ordeal had no detrimental effects on physiological health and was associated with subjective health improvements, and these improvements were greater for those who engaged in more intense forms of participation. Moreover, individuals who experienced health problems and/or were of low socioeconomic status sought more painful levels of engagement. We suggest two potential mechanisms for these effects: a bottom-up process triggered by neurological responses to pain and a top-down process related to increased social support and self-enhancement. These mechanisms may buffer stress-induced pressures and positively affect quality of life. Our results stress the importance of traditional cultural practices for coping with adversity, especially in contexts where psychiatric or other medical interventions are not widely available.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of Chicago Press , 2019. Vol. 60, no 5, p. 699-707
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-85389DOI: 10.1086/705665ISI: 000487977900006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85071938841OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-85389DiVA, id: diva2:1464015
Note

Funding Agencies:

Interacting Minds Centre at Aarhus University, Denmark  

LEVYNA Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion at Masaryk University, Czech Republic  

Medical School of the University of Exeter, United Kingdom  

University of Connecticut Humanities Institute 

Available from: 2020-09-03 Created: 2020-09-03 Last updated: 2020-09-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Khan, Sammyh

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Khan, Sammyh
In the same journal
Current Anthropology
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 177 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf