To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sexual selection revisited - Towards a gender-neutral theory and practice: A response to Vandermassen’s ‘sexual selection: A tale of male bias and feminist denial’
Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7108-2275
2007 (English)In: The European Journal of Women's Studies, ISSN 1350-5068, E-ISSN 1461-7420, Vol. 14, no 4, p. 341-348Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In a recent issue of this journal, Vandermassen suggested that feminists should include sexual selection theory and evolutionary psychology in a unifying theory of human nature. In response, this article aims to offer some insight into the development of sexual selection theory, to caution against Vandermassen’s unreserved assimilation and to promote the opposite ongoing integration - an inclusion of gender perspectives into evolutionary biology. In society today, opinions about maintaining traditional sex roles are often put forward on the basis of what is natural and how animals behave. However, the natural sciences have proved to be pervaded by gendered values and interests; Darwin’s theory of sexual selection has been criticized for being male biased, and partly due to the unwillingness of Darwin’s scientific contemporaries to accept female choice, research has been overwhelmingly focused on males. More recently, theory has become less gender biased and research has come to include a large variety of issues not present in the first version of the theory. However, there is a need to increase the awareness of gender bias in order to develop a gender-neutral evolutionary biology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2007. Vol. 14, no 4, p. 341-348
Keywords [en]
androcentric bias, evolutionary biology, evolutionary psychology, history of science, sexual selection
National Category
Gender Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117260DOI: 10.1177/1350506807081883ISI: 000250751200004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-34948816698OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-117260DiVA, id: diva2:1911291
Available from: 2024-11-07 Created: 2024-11-07 Last updated: 2024-11-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ah-King, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ah-King, Malin
In the same journal
The European Journal of Women's Studies
Gender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 195 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf