To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro universitets publikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Postoperative recovery after general and regional anesthesia in patients undergoing day surgery: A mixed methods study
Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-5403-4183
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7574-6745
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-4170-6451
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0534-4593
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, ISSN 1089-9472, E-ISSN 1532-8473, Vol. 34, nr 3, s. 517-528Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To investigate differences and describe experiences of postoperative recovery after day surgery between patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA) versus regional anesthesia (RA).

Design: A mixed methods design.

Methods: Day surgery patients (N = 401) were included. Postoperative recovery was assessed daily for 14 days using the Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery questionnaire included in a mobile application. In addition, qualitative interviews were completed with 20 day surgery patients. Quantitative and qualitative data were first analyzed separately and then merged.

Findings: There were significant differences in Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery between GA and RA on days 1 to 13 (P < .05). These findings could not be confirmed in the qualitative findings, except for psychological issues as well as tiredness and fatigue. Unexpected issues contributed to a greater extent to the theme not feeling well Pain in the surgical wound was overall the biggest problem.

Conclusions: There seems to be a poorer recovery after GA compared with RA. Tiredness or fatigue is present also after minor surgery in RA. Unexpected issues affect recovery negatively, and therefore should be addressed by health care.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 34, nr 3, s. 517-528
Emneord [en]
day surgery, fatigue, mixed methods, patient experience, patient-reported outcomes, postoperative
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-68568DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2018.08.003ISI: 000469462400009PubMedID: 30470465Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85057033263OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-68568DiVA, id: diva2:1241696
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2013-4765Swedish Research Council, 2015-02273Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-08-24 Laget: 2018-08-24 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-18bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Jaensson, MariaDahlberg, KarunaHugelius, Karin

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nilsson, UlricaJaensson, MariaDahlberg, KarunaHugelius, Karin
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 395 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf