To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro universitets publikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville Vic, Australia.
Department for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Region Örebro län. Department of Surgery; Institution of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Insitutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-2636-4745
Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville Vic, Australia.
2014 (engelsk)Inngår i: Anaesthesia, ISSN 0003-2409, E-ISSN 1365-2044, Vol. 69, nr 11, s. 1266-1278Artikkel, forskningsoversikt (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

To date, postoperative quality of recovery lacks a universally accepted definition and assessment technique. Current quality of recovery assessment tools vary in their development, breadth of assessment, validation, use of continuous vs dichotomous outcomes and focus on individual vs group recovery. They have progressed from identifying pure restitution of physiological parameters to multidimensional assessments of postoperative function and patient-focused outcomes. This review focuses on the progression of these tools towards an as yet unreached ideal that would provide multidimensional assessment of recovery over time at the individual and group level. A literature search identified 11 unique recovery assessment tools. The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale assesses recovery in multiple domains, including physiological, nociceptive, emotive, activities of daily living, cognition and patient satisfaction. It addresses recovery over time and compares individual patient data with base line, thus describing resumption of capacities and is an acceptable method for identification of individual patient recovery.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Hoboken, USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. Vol. 69, nr 11, s. 1266-1278
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-40275DOI: 10.1111/anae.12730ISI: 000343808400012PubMedID: 24888412Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84908544748OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-40275DiVA, id: diva2:776771
Merknad

Funding Agencies:

Baxter Healthcare

ERAS Society 

Baxter

Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-01-08 Laget: 2015-01-08 Sist oppdatert: 2020-12-01bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Ljungqvist, Olle

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Ljungqvist, Olle
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Anaesthesia

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 735 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf