To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The influence of environment: experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis - a qualitative study
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7283-1004
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3437-0590
Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4247-2236
2018 (English)In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, ISSN 0309-3646, E-ISSN 1746-1553, Vol. 42, no 1, p. 28-36Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Prostheses are used to varying degrees; however, little is known about how environmental aspects influence this use.

Objectives: To describe users" experiences of how environmental factors influence their use of a myoelectric arm prosthesis.

Study design: Qualitative and descriptive.

Methods: A total of 13 patients previously provided with a myoelectric prosthetic hand participated. Their age, sex, deficiency level, etiology, current prosthesis use, and experience varied. Semi-structured interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed through inductive content analysis.

Results: Four categories were created from the data: "Prosthesis function," "Other people's attitudes," "Support from family and healthcare," and "Individual's attitude and strategies." The overarching theme, "Various degrees of embodiment lead to different experiences of environmental barriers and facilitators," emerged from differences in individual responses depending on whether the individual was a daily or a non-daily prosthesis user. Environmental facilitators such as support from family and healthcare and good function and fit of the prosthesis seemed to help the embodiment of the prosthesis, leading to daily use. This embodiment seemed to reduce the influence of environmental barriers, for example, climate, attitudes, and technical shortcomings.

Conclusion: Embodiment of prostheses seems to reduce the impact of environmental barriers. Support and training may facilitate the embodiment of myoelectric prosthesis use.

Clinical relevance: For successful prosthetic rehabilitation, environmental factors such as support and information to the patient and their social network about the benefits of prosthesis use are important. Local access to training in myoelectric control gives more people the opportunity to adapt to prosthesis use and experience less environmental barriers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2018. Vol. 42, no 1, p. 28-36
Keywords [en]
Upper limb prosthetics; prosthetics; rehabilitation of prostheses users; rehabilitation; qualitative methods; rehabilitation; environment; amputation; upper extremity deformities; congenital
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-59041DOI: 10.1177/0309364617704801ISI: 000424669100005PubMedID: 28470129Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85041848843OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-59041DiVA, id: diva2:1129369
Note

Funding Agencies:

Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council  

Research committee of Örebro County Council, Sweden 

Available from: 2017-08-02 Created: 2017-08-02 Last updated: 2022-02-08Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Benefits and use of myoelectric arm prostheses: outcomes, influencing factors and experiences
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Benefits and use of myoelectric arm prostheses: outcomes, influencing factors and experiences
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

People with acquired upper limb loss or congenital limb reduction deficiency are often offered a myoelectric prosthesis to compensate for the missing hand. A common problem is the non-use of prostheses, and lack of training has been suggested as a reason for this. Today, myoelectric prosthetic hands are available with multiple grips to benefit the users, but these benefits have yet to be confirmed in daily activities. 

The overall aim of this thesis was to gather empirical evidence about the benefits and use of myoelectric arm prostheses, by investigating and describing the environmental factors influencing prosthesis use, describing a training method for the use of multi-grip prostheses and evaluating the effect of multigrip hands in daily activities. The users’ experience of environmental influences on prosthesis use were investigated in a survey (study I) and an interview study (study II). A scoping review of training methods for the use of multi-grip prostheses (study III) showed that training instructions are few and none were described in detail. Therefore, a new method for training, STAIR, was developed and described (study IV). This method was used when we investigated the benefits of multi-grip hands in a clinical trial (study V). We found that, after a period of structured training, users found the multi-grip prostheses beneficial for performing their daily activities and reducing their pain-related disability, and they reported an increase in prosthesis wearing time. 

In conclusion, prosthesis users experience most environmental barriers from the physical environment and from the prosthesis itself. Positive environmental factors, such as training and support from health care professionals, facilitate their adaptation to the prosthesis. When a prosthesis feels like a part of the user, the negative impact from the surrounding environment decreases. With a structured training method, it is possible to learn how to operate a multi-grip prosthesis and use it in daily activities. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2021. p. 88
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 241
Keywords
upper limb, amputation, artificial limbs, rehabilitation, occupational therapy, environment, qualitative methods
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-90692 (URN)978-91-7529-391-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-06-18, Örebro universitet, Campus USÖ, hörsal C3, Södra Grev Rosengatan 32, Örebro, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-03-24 Created: 2021-03-24 Last updated: 2023-12-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The influence of environment(246 kB)635 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 246 kBChecksum SHA-512
b58be0710ff603f4ad5468c6621fee28df6e7112e9d6a11bd8e4d6e7d1eb5dded7a2bbb66d162780652f4bd5d079c0edac5a85a2e4f620c5d4595ebeb9b50603
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Widehammar, CathrinePettersson, IngvorHermansson, Liselotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Widehammar, CathrinePettersson, IngvorHermansson, Liselotte
By organisation
School of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Prosthetics and Orthotics International
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 640 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 816 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf