To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Didactic dimensions of teaching content for and with students with intellectual disabilities (ID): a scoping review
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6608-8071
School of Teacher Education, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Special Needs Education, ISSN 0885-6257, E-ISSN 1469-591X, Vol. 40, no 1, p. 53-68Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Decisions schools make about teaching content fundamentally shape students' educational experience and their later life. These decisions often take a particular shape for students with intellectual disabilities. Although such decisions for this group are a prime concern in the governing and practice of education, they have gained little attention in research. Research that does investigate teaching content for students with intellectual disabilities often makes a distinction between Life Functional skills (LFS) and Academic Content (AC) and treats these as being quite separate. The study at hand explores the nuances of and relationship between the two through a scoping review, and contributes knowledge on didactical aspects and the how and why of teaching content as depicted in research. Results indicate that research on teaching content entails a complex process of valuing the content in which AC and LFS often overlap. Results also illustrate that students and teachers are absent from the research on teaching content and not included as active participants; researchers' methods often take precedence over teachers' and students' valuing of teaching content or methods.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2025. Vol. 40, no 1, p. 53-68
Keywords [en]
Word, didactics, intellectual disability, teaching, review, content
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-112701DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2024.2323250ISI: 001175014000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85186931154OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-112701DiVA, id: diva2:1848220
Available from: 2024-04-02 Created: 2024-04-02 Last updated: 2026-03-24Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Didaktiska perspektiv på undervisning för elever med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning - Undervisningens innehåll och motiv
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Didaktiska perspektiv på undervisning för elever med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning - Undervisningens innehåll och motiv
2026 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this dissertation is to contribute to knowledge about teachers’ didactic choices when teaching content to students with intellectual disabilities. To achieve this, the study examines how teachers choose and justify teaching content. The focus is on content that highlights the educational goals of democracy and sustainable development. The results from the sub-studies are developed into didactic principles that explain how teachers can make content decisions to prepare students with intellectual disabilities for adulthood in society and the world. Didactic theory helps explain teachers’ content choices by emphasizing the connections among teachers, students, and content, as well as the democratic purpose of education and the broader contexts of schooling, society, and global sustainability. Three studies were conducted: a scoping review (Study I) and two interview and observation studies (Studies II and III). Study I shows that teachers’ didactic choices are rarely explicitly discussed in prior research and that academic content often overlaps with life functional content. Study II identifies participation, independence, and communication as key reasons for selecting content for students with intellectual disabilities; these reasons are evident across school, societal, and global contexts. Study III shows that teachers incorporate the Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability concepts into their teaching. These choices help students develop skills that support a sustainable society and world – such as self-determination, codetermination, and solidarity. In the final chapter, the findings are synthesized into three didactic principles based on teachers’ choices: 1. Teaching should give students with intellectual disabilities the chance to become active agents in a democratic society. 2. Teaching should provide students with intellectual disabilities opportunities for communication, independence, and participation. 3. Teaching should enable students with intellectual disabilities to contribute to sustainable development.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2026. p. 138
Series
Örebro Studies in Education, ISSN 1404-9570 ; 72
Keywords
Intellectual disability, special education, didactics, teaching content, sustainable development
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-127093 (URN)9789175297514 (ISBN)9789175297521 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-04-17, Örebro universitet, Forumhuset, Hörsal F, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 13:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-02-05 Created: 2026-02-05 Last updated: 2026-03-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wåger, Jonny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wåger, Jonny
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Special Needs Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 204 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf