To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychology Students' Experiences of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination as an Assessment of Professional Skills in Psychology
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0097-4035
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2283-7552
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Psychology Learning & Teaching (PLAT), ISSN 1475-7257, Vol. 23, no 3, p. 390-404Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A challenge for professional psychology programs is the assessment of students' professional competence. Despite its potential, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has not gained widespread use in the psychological field. However, at Ume & aring; University and & Ouml;rebro University in Sweden, the OSCE has been introduced at the Clinical psychology programs to assess professional competence. The aim of this study was to explore students' perceptions of whether and how, preparing for and performing the OSCE benefits their professional learning and prepares them for clinical practice. A web-based questionnaire was administered to 88 psychology students who completed the OSCE and field training. Most of the students perceived the OSCE as a valuable experience that benefits their learning. The OSCE prepared them for clinical practice through practical hands-on training, and by providing essential experience in client interaction, increasing students' confidence in the role as a psychologist. Students also reported that feedback from the OSCE was crucial for their ongoing learning, but that the authenticity of the examination can be improved. Based on these findings, recommendations for future OSCEs in professional psychology include appropriate preparations, providing constructive feedback as well as striving for high authenticity in the tasks of the OSCE stations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2024. Vol. 23, no 3, p. 390-404
Keywords [en]
Assessment methods, summative assessment, formative assessment, professional education, professional psychology training
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-116750DOI: 10.1177/14757257241267101ISI: 001326592700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85205705647OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-116750DiVA, id: diva2:1906106
Funder
Umeå University, FS2.1.6-344-19Available from: 2024-10-16 Created: 2024-10-16 Last updated: 2025-01-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Glatz, TereseBergbom, SofiaEdlund, Sara

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glatz, TereseBergbom, SofiaEdlund, Sara
By organisation
School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 56 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf