Comparison of two pump-based systems for sampling small microplastics (>10 μM) in coastal watersShow others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Environmental Pollution, ISSN 0269-7491, E-ISSN 1873-6424, Vol. 363, no 2, article id 125192Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Microplastics (MPs) have emerged as an important research topic due to their ubiquity in the environment and their potentially harmful effects on aquatic biota. However, our knowledge of the abundance and characteristics of the smaller fraction of MPs (<300 μm) in marine waters remains limited. This study aims to compare two different filter pump devices: AAU-UFO (Universal Filtering Object) pump and KCD (KC Denmark's Micro Plastic Particle) pump for sampling small (>10 μm) MPs. Coastal waters from six sites in the Gulf of Bothnia (Baltic Sea) were sampled with both devices. The concentration and composition of the collected MPs were analyzed by FPA-μFTIR imaging. The median concentrations were 117 MPs/m3 with a median mass of 118 μg/m3 and 162 MPs/m3 with a median mass of 117 μg/m3, for the UFO pump and KCD pump, respectively. The predominant MP shape was fragment, and the most abundant polymers were polyester, polyethylene, and polypropylene. MPs smaller than 300 μm represented more than 90% of the MPs in the samples. The recorded microplastic concentrations were several orders of magnitude higher than those previously reported using a Manta net in this area, highlighting the importance of analyzing microplastics smaller than 300 μm. No significant differences in MP concentrations were found between samples from the two filter pumps, indicating that both devices are comparably effective systems for sampling MPs (>10 μm) in coastal waters. Overall, our findings contribute to harmonizing sampling methodologies for small MPs in aquatic systems, which is crucial for establishing effective monitoring programs and ensuring accurate risk assessments.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2024. Vol. 363, no 2, article id 125192
Keywords [en]
Baltic Sea, MPs sampling, Pump filter system, microplastics, μFTIR-imaging
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117058DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125192ISI: 001346970400001PubMedID: 39461611Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85207243247OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-117058DiVA, id: diva2:1908519
Note
RA acknowledge funding support from the Spanish Ministry of Science through a Ramón y Cajal Program grant (RYC 2018-025770-I). This study was also supported by framework of JPI Oceans: RA and AR were financially supported through “RESPONSE” (Towards a risk-based assessment of microplastic pollution in marine ecosystems - Grant nr. MICROPLASTICC18_00042), through the Innovation Fund-Denmark (C2020/65 DTU-ULPGC agreement) to RA and the Swedish national agency to AR. AV was financially supported by “FACTS” (Fluxes and Fate of Microplastics in Northern European Waters - Innovation Fund Denmark/Danmarks Innova- tons fond - Project FACTS - Fluxes and Fate of Microplastics in Northern European Waters; 9087-00005B – FACTS).
Corrigendum to ‘Comparison of two pump-based systems for sampling small microplastics (>10 μM) in coastal waters’. Kevin Ugwu, Alvise Vianello, Rodrigo Almeda, Lucian Iordachescu, Anna Rotanderr. [Environmental Pollution 363-P2 (2024) 125192], Environmental Pollution,2024, 125531,ISSN 0269-7491,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125531.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749124022486).
2024-10-282024-10-282024-12-23Bibliographically approved