To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Image quality assessment in spine surgery: a comparison of intraoperative CBCT and postoperative MDCT
Department of Trauma and Musculoskeletal Radiology, ME Trauma Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 64, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Acta Neurochirurgica, ISSN 0001-6268, E-ISSN 0942-0940, Vol. 167, no 1, article id 94Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides equivalent image quality to postoperative multidetector CT (MDCT) in spine surgery, potentially eliminating unnecessary imaging and cumulative radiation exposure.

METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (16 men, 11 women; median age 39 years) treated with spinal fixation surgery were evaluated using intraoperative CBCT and postoperative MDCT. The images were independently evaluated by four neuroradiologists, utilizing a five-step Likert scale and visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis. The area under the VGC curve (AUCVGC) quantified preferences between modalities. Intra- and inter-observer variability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Image quality was objectively evaluated by contrast and signal-to-noise measurements (CNR, SNR).

RESULTS: In image quality, CBCT was the preferred modality in thoracolumbar spine (AUCVGC = 0.58, p < 0.001). Conversely, MDCT was preferred in cervical spine (AUCVGC = 0.38, p < 0.004). The agreement was good for inter-observer and moderate in intra-observer (ICC 0.76-0.77 vs 0.60-0.71), p < 0.001. SNR and CNR were comparable in thoracolumbar imaging, while MDCT provided superior and more consistent image quality in the cervical spine, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION: In spine surgery, CBCT provides superior image quality for thoracolumbar imaging, while MDCT performs better for cervical imaging. Intraoperative CBCT could potentially replace postoperative MDCT in thoracolumbar spine procedures, while postoperative MDCT remains essential for cervical spine assessment.

KEY POINTS: Subjective assessment demonstrated that CBCT was the preferred modality for thoracolumbar spine imaging, while MDCT was favored for cervical spine imaging. Agreement between readers was good, while individual readings showed moderate consistency in repeated assessments. Objective assessment of image clarity and detail showed both modalities performed equally well in the thoracolumbar spine, while MDCT performed better in the cervical spine. Intraoperative CBCT proves superior to postoperative MDCT for thoracolumbar spine imaging, potentially eliminating redundant scans, and improving workflow. Postoperative MDCT remains essential for cervical spine procedures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2025. Vol. 167, no 1, article id 94
Keywords [en]
Cone beam computed tomography, Image quality, Neuroradiology, Neurosurgery, Spine
National Category
Radiology and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-120343DOI: 10.1007/s00701-025-06503-wISI: 001456580300001PubMedID: 40164732Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105001446163OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-120343DiVA, id: diva2:1948857
Funder
Karolinska InstituteAvailable from: 2025-04-01 Created: 2025-04-01 Last updated: 2025-04-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Elmi-Terander, AdrianEdström, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Elmi-Terander, AdrianEdström, Erik
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Acta Neurochirurgica
Radiology and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf