To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of an opioid-free care pathway vs. opioid-based standard care on postoperative pain and postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A multicentre randomised controlled trial
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6488-8406
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden;L Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine/Pain Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Anaesthesiology, ISSN 0265-0215, E-ISSN 1365-2346, Vol. 42, no 8, p. 714-726Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) may enhance postoperative recovery after bariatric surgery, but its combined effect with opioid-free interventions has not been studied.

OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative pain and recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery with a total opioid-free care pathway and conventional opioid-based treatment. DESIGN: A multicentre nonblinded controlled trial. SETTING: Two university hospitals in Sweden.

PATIENTS: Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery were enrolled between May 2019 and November 2023. Of 837 patients screened, 112 were randomised, and 110 were included in the analysis: 55 in the intervention and 55 in the control group.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to an opioid-based standard care (control group) or to an opioid-free care pathway (intervention group), including intraoperative OFA and postoperative first-line transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in patient-reported postoperative pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from arrival in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) until discharge to the surgical ward. Key secondary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity, in-hospital opioid consumption, and postoperative quality of recovery scale (PQRS) scores.

RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups regarding the changes in pain intensity from arrival in PACU until discharge to the ward, with mean ± SD changes in NRS of 3.20 ± 3.01 (intervention) vs. 3.15 ± 2.25 (control); mean difference (MD) 0.04 [(95% confidence interval (CI), -1.00 to 1.08); P = 0.97], and pain intensity at 24 h (P = 0.078), 72 h (P = 0.060), and 3 months (P = 0.30) postoperatively. The intervention group had a significantly lower opioid consumption in the PACU; mean morphine equivalents 6.08 ± 12.31 vs. 51.1 ± 14.9 mg; MD -45.0 (95% CI, -50.1 to -39.8) mg; P < 0.0001; and during the hospital stay MD -40.3 (95% CI, -54.4 to -25.9) mg; P < 0.0001. Total PQRS scores did not differ significantly over the 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION: The opioid-free care pathway offers patients pain relief and recovery outcomes comparable to conventional opioid-based care and reduces opioid use after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03756961.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2025. Vol. 42, no 8, p. 714-726
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-121090DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002193ISI: 001520869200001PubMedID: 40371564OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-121090DiVA, id: diva2:1958689
Funder
University of Gothenburg, GU 2023/837Swedish Research Council, 2021-01166
Note

Funding Agencies:

Centre for Person-centred Care at the University of Gothenburg (GU 2023/837) and grants from the Swedish Research Council (Grant No. 2021-01166) and the Swedish state under the Swedish government and county councils ALF agreement (Grant No. ALFGBG-965554) financed this study.

Available from: 2025-05-16 Created: 2025-05-16 Last updated: 2025-07-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Stenberg, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olausson, AlexanderStenberg, Erik
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf