Adult Proxy Online Record Access - Differences Across Four Countries Show others and affiliations
2025 (English) In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, ISSN 0926-9630, E-ISSN 1879-8365, Vol. 332, p. 216-220Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Patients' online record access (ORA) enables patients to involve their informal caregivers in care management by sharing health information, either through proxy access functionality or informally. The European Health Data Space mandates that member countries should ensure that patients can assign a proxy to have online access to their health data. In this study, we aimed to explore the current state of proxy ORA in four countries with mature ORA implementations; Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Estonia. We identified three types of proxy ORA; full proxy ORA, no proxy ORA, and controlled proxy ORA. Further guidance on ethically sound and secure proxy ORA functionality that complies with national and EU regulations and policies is warranted to ensure equal rights for citizens across Europe.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages IOS Press, 2025. Vol. 332, p. 216-220
Keywords [en]
Electronic Health Record, Information Sharing, Patient Portal, Patients’ Online Record Access, Proxy Access
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-124193 DOI: 10.3233/SHTI251530 PubMedID: 41041777 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-124193 DiVA, id: diva2:2003830
Funder NordForsk, 00477 The Kamprad Family Foundation, 20250282
Note Funding Agencies:
This work was supported by NordForsk via funding to NORDeHEALTH (No. 100477),and The Kamprad Family Foundation for Entrepreneurship, Research & Charity viafunding to the project FamORA (No. 20250282).
2025-10-062025-10-062025-10-06 Bibliographically approved