To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Biomarkers of Lupus Nephritis Histopathology: Where Do We Stand?
Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Arthritis & Rheumatology, ISSN 2326-5191, E-ISSN 2326-5205Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: Lupus nephritis (LN) is characterized by a variable disease course, necessitating continuous monitoring. There is an urgent need to identify non-invasive biomarkers. By reviewing and critically assessing the quality of existing studies on LN biomarkers correlating with histopathology, we here explore the challenges in promoting their use in clinical practice and identify promising candidates for future validation.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted, including studies on adult patients with biopsy-proven LN, published between 2012 and 2024. The search focused on studies demonstrating correlations between biomarkers and histological findings, particularly the National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices, the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society histological classes, and specific active and chronic lesions. The quality of selected articles was assessed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts utilizing a standardized scoring system.

RESULTS: Ninety-three articles investigating the potential utility of over 100 biomarkers were selected. In quality assessment, 68% of the articles were weak or very weak (score<5, scale 2-9). From the remaining articles (adequate or robust) we identified five biomarkers with a potential for implementation in clinical practice: TGF-β1, PTX3, (s)CD163, CD11b, and IL-16.

CONCLUSION: The methodological heterogeneity across studies and the overall moderate score of the quality of the articles represent obstacles to the implementation of new biomarkers into clinical practice. The LN working group advocates further research on selected biomarkers that demonstrated good capacity to reflect specific histopathological features outperforming traditional tests. At present, the choice of biomarkers that perform to these standards is very limited.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025.
National Category
Autoimmunity and Inflammation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-124702DOI: 10.1002/art.43427PubMedID: 41169181OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-124702DiVA, id: diva2:2010754
Available from: 2025-11-03 Created: 2025-11-03 Last updated: 2025-11-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Parodis, Ioannis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Parodis, Ioannis
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Autoimmunity and Inflammation

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 15 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf