To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
It’s Complicated: Maillard, Umami and Flavor Complexity Are Not Key Factors in Liking of Gray Pea Burgers in a Real Consumption Context
Örebro University, School of Hospitality, Culinary Arts & Meal Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3827-829X
School of Hospitality, Culinary Arts and Meal Science, Örebro University, Grythyttan, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Hospitality, Culinary Arts & Meal Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9538-3937
Örebro University, School of Hospitality, Culinary Arts & Meal Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8848-5812
2026 (English)In: Foods, E-ISSN 2304-8158, Vol. 15, no 6, article id 1015Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Literature suggests that umami, Maillard reaction, and flavor complexity could contribute to sensorial acceptability of plant-based alternatives, but that was yet to be tested. Two field studies with 612 paying customers evaluating a complete meal were conducted in an operating restaurant in Sweden. In the first study, a gray pea burger (Control) was compared to burgers with added monosodium glutamate (MSG) (Umami), grilled (Maillard), or both grilled and added MSG (Complex). In the second study, a simplified gray pea burger (Control 2) was compared to a grilled burger with MSG and aromatics (Complex 2). Check-all-that-apply (CATA) tests show that participants perceived sensory differences between the samples, but their effects in hedonic ratings were inconclusive; only the Maillard sample was significantly more liked than Control and Complex burgers in Study 1. Although limited to their variables and context, these two experiments indicate that umami, Maillard reaction, and complexity, per se, are not key factors to improve liking and willingness to buy (WTB) of plant-based dishes. These results suggest that rather than trying to emulate sensory characteristics considered associated with meat, future research could prioritize addressing cultural barriers to vegetarian food.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2026. Vol. 15, no 6, article id 1015
Keywords [en]
protein transition, vegetarian, food service, culinary arts, recipe development
National Category
Food Science
Research subject
Culinary Arts and Meal Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-127966DOI: 10.3390/foods15061015ISI: 001726232200001PubMedID: 41897737OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-127966DiVA, id: diva2:2045964
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2020–02843Region Örebro CountyÖrebro University, 20361373Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth
Note

This research was funded by PAN Sweden research center funded by the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (dnr: 2020–02843), and the European Union, the Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth, Örebro Region, and the Food & Health Center at Örebro University (id: 20361373).

Available from: 2026-03-13 Created: 2026-03-13 Last updated: 2026-04-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Baptista, IuriWestling, MagnusÖström, Åsa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Baptista, IuriWestling, MagnusÖström, Åsa
By organisation
School of Hospitality, Culinary Arts & Meal Science
In the same journal
Foods
Food Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf