To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intra-aortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: insights from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry
Department of Thoracic Surgery and Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Thoracic Surgery and Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Thoracic Surgery and Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Thoracic Surgery and Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Coronary Artery Disease, ISSN 0954-6928, E-ISSN 1473-5830Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock remains the leading cause of in-hospital death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), once widely used, was downgraded in European guidelines after a major randomized trial showed no mortality benefit. This prospective observational study evaluated the impact of IABP on 30-day mortality and in-hospital complications in real-world patients with MI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

METHODS: Data were obtained from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, including all percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed across 31 hospitals in Sweden between 2005 and 2018. A total of 2991 patients with cardiogenic shock were included, of whom 737 (25%) received IABP. To account for baseline differences, instrumental variable analysis was applied using hospital treatment preference as the instrument.

RESULTS: At 30 days, 52% of patients had died, and by 1 year, mortality reached 63.2%. In-hospital complications occurred in 13.4% of patients. IABP treatment was not associated with reduced mortality at 30 days [risk reduction: -1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -15.7 to 13.5; P = 0.881] or at 1 year (risk reduction: -0.8%, 95% CI: -23.2 to 0.06; P = 0.258). However, IABP use was associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital complications (increase of 26.1%, 95% CI: 15.2-36.8; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: IABP did not improve short- or long-term survival in patients with MI-related cardiogenic shock but was linked to increased complications, supporting current guideline recommendations against its routine use.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2026.
Keywords [en]
cardiogenic shock, coronary artery disease, heart failure, intra-aortic balloon pump, percutaneous coronary intervention
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-128315DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001634PubMedID: 41934130OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-128315DiVA, id: diva2:2053204
Available from: 2026-04-15 Created: 2026-04-15 Last updated: 2026-04-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Fröbert, Ole

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fröbert, Ole
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Coronary Artery Disease
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf