To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Peritoneal bridging versus fascial closure in laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay ventral hernia mesh repair: a randomized clinical trial
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Departments of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2090-4563
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. epartments of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Emergency Department, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
2020 (English)In: BJS Open, E-ISSN 2474-9842, Vol. 4, no 4, p. 587-592Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Many patients develop seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. It was hypothesized that leaving the hernial sac in situ may cause this complication.

METHODS: In this patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, parallel-design single-centre trial, patients undergoing laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh ventral hernia repair were randomized (1 : 1) to either conventional fascial closure or peritoneal bridging. The primary endpoint was the incidence of seroma 12 months after index surgery detected by CT, evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS: Between September 2017 and May 2018, 62 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 25 were randomized to conventional closure and 25 to peritoneal bridging. At 3 months, one patient was lost to follow-up in the conventional and peritoneal bridging groups respectively. No seroma was detected at 6 or 12 months in either group. The prevalence of clinical seroma was four of 25 (16 (95 per cent c.i. 2 to 30) per cent) versus none of 25 patients in the conventional fascial closure and peritoneal bridging groups respectively at 1 month after surgery (P = 0·110), and two of 24 (8 (0 to 19) per cent) versus none of 25 at 3 months (P = 0·235). There were no significant differences between the groups in other postoperative complications (one of 25 versus 0 of 25), rate of recurrent hernia within 1 year (none in either group) or postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION: Conventional fascial closure and peritoneal bridging did not differ with regard to seroma formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03344575).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 4, no 4, p. 587-592
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-82530DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50305ISI: 000536310700001PubMedID: 32463163Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85096202958OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-82530DiVA, id: diva2:1435894
Funder
The Karolinska Institutet's Research Foundation
Note

Funding Agency:

Örebro University Hospital

Available from: 2020-06-05 Created: 2020-06-05 Last updated: 2024-01-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ali, FathallaWallin, Göran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ali, FathallaWallin, Göran
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
BJS Open
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 491 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf