To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Barriers and facilitators to implementing coronary care networks in South Africa: a qualitative study
Department of Clinical Research and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Clinical Research and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3290-4111
Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: African Health Sciences, ISSN 1680-6905, E-ISSN 1729-0503, Vol. 20, no 1, p. 338-350Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is on the rise in sub-Saharan Africa. South Africa consistently fails to deliver timely reperfusion to these patients, possibly due to under-developed coronary care networks (CCN).

Objectives: To determine the current perceived state of CCNs, to determine the barriers to optimising CCNs and to suggest facilitators to optimising CCNs within the South African context.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, by performing two structured in-depth and two focus group interviews (n=4 and 5, respectively), inviting a purposely heterogeneous sample of 11 paramedics (n=4), doctors (n=5), and nurses (n=2) working within different settings in South African CCNs. Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to content analysis.

Results: Participants described an under-resourced, unprioritised and fragmented CCN with significant variation in performance. Barriers to CCN optimisation resided in recognition and diagnosis of STEMI, transport and treatment decisions, and delays. Participants suggested that thrombolysing all STEMI patients could facilitate earlier reperfusion and that pre-hospital thrombolysis should be considered. Participants highlighted the need for regionalised STEMI guidelines, and the need for further research.

Conclusion: Numerous barriers were highlighted. Healthcare policy-makers should prioritise the development of CCNs that is underpinned by evidence and that is contextualised to each specific region within the South African health care system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
NISC - National Inquiry Services Centre, 2020. Vol. 20, no 1, p. 338-350
Keywords [en]
Health care system, emergency care, cardiovascular disease
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-82931DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v20i1.39ISI: 000536120700039PubMedID: 33402921Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85085318788OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-82931DiVA, id: diva2:1438286
Available from: 2020-06-10 Created: 2020-06-10 Last updated: 2024-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kurland, Lisa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kurland, Lisa
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
African Health Sciences
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 206 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf