To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pain and Discomfort During the First Week of Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) Using Two Different RME Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Public Dental Service, Gävle, Sweden; Uppsala University, Region Gävleborg, Sweden.
Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Örebro, Sweden; Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9851-8996
2017 (English)In: Angle orthodontist, ISSN 0003-3219, E-ISSN 1945-7103, Vol. 87, no 3, p. 391-396Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To evaluate and compare perceived pain intensity, discomfort, and jaw function impairment during the first week with tooth-borne or tooth-bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four patients (28 girls and 26 boys) with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD 1.28 years) were randomized into two groups. Group A received a conventional hyrax appliance and group B a hybrid hyrax appliance anchored on mini-implants in the anterior palate. Questionnaires were used to assess pain intensity, discomfort, analgesic consumption, and jaw function impairment on the first and fourth days after RME appliance insertion. Results: Fifty patients answered both questionnaires. Overall median pain on the first day in treatment was 13.0 (range 0-82) and 3.5 (0-78) for groups A and B, respectively, with no significant differences in pain, discomfort, analgesic consumption, or functional jaw impairment between groups. Overall median pain on the fourth day was 9.0 (0-90) and 2.0 (0-71) for groups A and B, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. There were also no significant differences in pain levels within group A, while group B scored significantly lower concerning pain from molars and incisors and tensions from the jaw on day 4 than on the first day in treatment. There was a significant positive correlation between age and pain and discomfort on the fourth day in treatment. No correlations were found between sex and pain and discomfort, analgesic consumption, and jaw function impairment. Conclusions: Both tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne RME were generally well tolerated by the patients during the first week of treatment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
E H Angle Orthodontists Research & Education Foundation, Inc. , 2017. Vol. 87, no 3, p. 391-396
Keywords [en]
Rapid maxillary expansion, Pain and discomfort, Mini-implants, Questionnaire
National Category
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-83548DOI: 10.2319/091216-686.1ISI: 000402481800005PubMedID: 28029266Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85019887971OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-83548DiVA, id: diva2:1446521
Note

Funding Agency:

Private Practice of Orthodontics in Traben-Trabach, Germany

Available from: 2020-06-24 Created: 2020-06-24 Last updated: 2020-08-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bazargani, Farhan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bazargani, Farhan
In the same journal
Angle orthodontist
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 300 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf