To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
“Heroes” and “Villains” of World History across Cultures
Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, Bremen, Germany.
Victoria University of Wellington, School of Psychology, Wellington, New Zealand.
University ofAuckland, School of Psychology, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of the Basque Country, School of Psychology, San Sebastián, Spain.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 10, no 2, article id e0115641Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Emergent properties of global political culture were examined using data from the World History Survey (WHS) involving 6,902 university students in 37 countries evaluating 40 figures from world history. Multidimensional scaling and factor analysis techniques found only limited forms of universality in evaluations across Western, Catholic/Orthodox, Muslim, and Asian country clusters. The highest consensus across cultures involved scientific innovators, with Einstein having the most positive evaluation overall. Peaceful humanitarians like Mother Theresa and Gandhi followed. There was much less cross-cultural consistency in the evaluation of negative figures, led by Hitler, Osama bin Laden, and Saddam Hussein. After more traditional empirical methods (e.g., factor analysis) failed to identify meaningful cross-cultural patterns, Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to identify four global representational profiles: Secular and Religious Idealists were overwhelmingly prevalent in Christian countries, and Political Realists were common in Muslim and Asian countries. We discuss possible consequences and interpretations of these different representational profiles.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public Library of Science , 2015. Vol. 10, no 2, article id e0115641
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-85355DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115641ISI: 000349250700002PubMedID: 25651504Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84922354703OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-85355DiVA, id: diva2:1463985
Note

Funding Agency:

Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange  RG016-P-10

Available from: 2020-09-03 Created: 2020-09-03 Last updated: 2021-06-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Khan, Sammyh

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Khan, Sammyh
In the same journal
PLOS ONE
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 97 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf