To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Who are 'we'? Implicit associations between ethnic and national symbols for Maori and Pakeha in New Zealand
Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Victoria University of Wellington, School of Psychology, Wellington, New Zealand.
Victoria University of Wellington, School of Psychology, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7048-9786
2008 (English)In: New Zealand journal of psychology (Christchurch. 1983), ISSN 0112-109X, Vol. 37, no 2, p. 38-49Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research examining how New Zealanders perceive their nation and its peoples remains scarce. The current study examined one specific aspect of such cognitions-that of the degree to which self-identified members of the Indigenous population (Maori) and New Zealanders of European descent (Pakeha) automatically perceive their own and each other's language and peoples as belonging to the nation. We used reaction-time measures (the Implicit Association Test) administered to university undergraduate samples. Majority group members (Pakeha) showed minimal implicit ingroup biases, and perceived their own ingroup and culture, and Maori peoples and culture, as equally representative of the nation. Minority group members (Maori), in contrast, perceived their ingroup and culture as being more closely associated with representations of the nation. The answer to the question of who 'we' are then, is contingent upon ethnic group membership. These findings differ dramatically from theory and research from the United States, which predict that minority groups-especially minority groups such as Maori that are consistently disadvantaged according to national indicators of income and general wellbeing-should display outgroup biases at the implicit level. In New Zealand, it seems that Maori culture helps to promote the positive distinctiveness of the nation on the world stage, and as our results suggest, Maori may therefore have considerable symbolic power to validate national identity for many majority group (Pakeha) New Zealanders.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New Zealand Psychological Society , 2008. Vol. 37, no 2, p. 38-49
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-85414Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-62549157387OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-85414DiVA, id: diva2:1463991
Available from: 2020-09-03 Created: 2020-09-03 Last updated: 2024-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

ScopusFree full text

Authority records

Khan, Sammyh

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Khan, Sammyh
In the same journal
New Zealand journal of psychology (Christchurch. 1983)
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 152 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf