To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is the Sharing Economy just a Collective Fantasy? Exploring Institutional Illogics in Market Societies
Örebro University, Örebro University School of Business.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1206-7945
2020 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This conceptual paper aims to continue the debate initiated by Vince (2019) to deepen the understanding of institutional logic by further bringing psychoanalytical concepts into organizational and institutional scholarship. The paper argues the (re)enactment of institutional logics is based on the crucial dialectic between conscious manifestations and the unconscious ones. Institutional illogics as the hidden 'other' side of institutional logics may be a missing piece in the puzzle of understanding how institutions are (re-)enacted in institutionalization and institutional change processes. The conceptual arguments this paper illustrates review and analyze the contemporary phenomenon of the platform-mediated sharing economy. Based on the previous academic and public discourse, the sharing economy's institutionalization process can be described as having become a sharing fantasy where collectively structured fantasies unfold due to hidden and unseen patterns. By framing sharing as a structured fantasy, three institutional illogics emerge dehumanizing illogic, as-if illogic, and illogic of unconscious guilt. By combining micro-level analysis of the market society, such as psychoanalytical decision-making processes, with macro-level perspectives of institutions, we can understand how the (re)enactment of dominant (il)logics as collective fantasies jeopardize fundamental institutional change.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020.
Keywords [en]
institutional illogics, institutional logics, market society, unconscious institutions, sharing economy
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-90704OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-90704DiVA, id: diva2:1539583
Conference
36th EGOS Colloquium: Organizing for a Sustainable Future: Responsibility, Renewal & Resistance (EGOS 2020), University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (virtual conference), July 2–4, 2020
Available from: 2021-03-24 Created: 2021-03-24 Last updated: 2021-03-24Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Platforms in Liquid Modernity: Essays about the Sharing Economy, Digital Platforms, and Institutions
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Platforms in Liquid Modernity: Essays about the Sharing Economy, Digital Platforms, and Institutions
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The year 2020 feels like the beginning of a crescendo of change. As environmental and social challenges reach an all-time high, the organization of our societies is coming under scrutiny. We, as a society, turn to technology to reinvent the organization of social life after disruptive episodes. Inspired by Bauman's theorizing to describe the cultural and societal zeitgeist, this thesis explains the institutionalization of one of the most promising alternative forms of organization of the past decade: the sharing economy.

Comprised of nine essays centered around three focal areas: (1) Organizational change, (2) Market change, and (3) Societal change, this thesis aims to explain the institutionalization of digital sharing platforms in liquid modern society.

This thesis finds that digital sharing platforms act as societal organizers on several dimensions of “in-betweenness.” As this moment in time can also be characterized as a period of “interregnum”—another moment of in-betweenness—where old structures are continuously disrupted but no clear new path has emerged, digital platform providers fill a structural void in our highly individualized society. Digital platform providers use community as an anchor, a belief, and sets of practices to create an emerging (intermediary) institution around which different forms of organization manifest.

Digital sharing platforms have, however, remained a grace note on systemic change: ornamental and practically non-essential. Still, digital platforms are setting new norms in all areas of organizational, market, and societal life. By evoking both elements of community and market, digital platforms are playing an important part in creating a symphony of our future societal order.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2021. p. 129
Series
Örebro Studies in Business - Dissertations, ISSN 1654-8841 ; 16
Keywords
sharing economy, digital platforms, institutional theory, institutional logics, social ordering, Social Media Analytics, community, liquid modernity, interregnum, in-betweenness
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-89635 (URN)978-91-7529-377-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-04-29, Örebro universitet, Forumhuset, Hörsal F, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 14:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-02-16 Created: 2021-02-16 Last updated: 2021-03-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Geissinger, Andrea

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Geissinger, Andrea
By organisation
Örebro University School of Business
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 180 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf