To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Introducing a new design of a digital tool to increase vibration risk assessments: challenges with education based interventions
Section of Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine epartment, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, ISSN 1080-3548, E-ISSN 2376-9130, Vol. 28, no 3, p. 1705-1710Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether introducing a digital risk assessment tool, the Swedish National Vibration Database, would increase the number of risk assessments on hand-arm and whole-body vibration. Employer and safety representatives from companies where vibration exposure is common were invited.

Methods: Of the 2953 invited companies, 1916 were selected for educational intervention and the remaining 1037 companies served as a control group with no intervention. For the educational intervention, participating companies were further divided into two groups (group A, n = 26; group B, n = 47) that both received information regarding risk assessment, but group B was also informed about the digital tool. Both groups answered a questionnaire on risk assessment before the intervention and at the follow-up, 6 months later; the control group received the same questionnaire but no education (group C, n = 22).

Results: Of the invited companies, only 2% chose to participate and 7% at follow-up. Seventy-eight percent of the participants had made some kind of risk assessment of vibration at follow-up.

Conclusion: Due to the low participation rate among invited companies, this study is not able to draw any conclusions on whether the digital tool can be used to increase the number of risk assessments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2022. Vol. 28, no 3, p. 1705-1710
Keywords [en]
Digital-tool, intervention, questionnaire, risk assessment, vibration
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-91866DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1928389ISI: 000659328400001PubMedID: 33998975Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85107569959OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-91866DiVA, id: diva2:1556343
Funder
AFA InsuranceAvailable from: 2021-05-21 Created: 2021-05-21 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Fornander, LouiseWesterlund, Jessica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fornander, LouiseWesterlund, Jessica
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 67 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf