To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Orthopedic Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3905-7210
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Orthopedic Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7376-4664
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
2021 (English)In: Trials, E-ISSN 1745-6215, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 607Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is the most common disease in the cervical spine, affecting patients around 50-55 year of age. An operative treatment is common clinical praxis when non-operative treatment fails. The controversy is in the choice of operative treatment, conducting either anterior cervical decompression and fusion or posterior foraminotomy. The study objective is to evaluate short- and long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior foraminotomy (PF)

METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial with 1:1 randomization, ACDF vs. PF including 110 patients. The primary aim is to evaluate if PF is non-inferior to ACDF using a non-inferiority design with ACDF as "active control." The neck disability index (NDI) is the primary outcome measure, and duration of follow-up is 2 years.

DISCUSSION: Due to absence of high level of evidence, the authors believe that a RCT will improve the evidence for using the different surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy and strengthen current surgical treatment recommendation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04177849. Registered on November 26, 2019.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2021. Vol. 22, no 1, article id 607
Keywords [en]
Anterior cervical decompression, Anterior cervical discectomy, Posterior foraminotomy, Randomized control trial
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-94367DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05492-2ISI: 000693804800004PubMedID: 34496941Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85114496579OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-94367DiVA, id: diva2:1594948
Note

Funding Agency:

Cervical Spine Research Society

Correction to: Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 22, 667 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05623-9

Available from: 2021-09-16 Created: 2021-09-16 Last updated: 2025-04-23Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Operative Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion and Posterior Foraminotomy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Operative Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion and Posterior Foraminotomy
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Cervical radiculopathy is the most frequent condition of the cervical spine. Operative treatment is a commonly performed when nonsurgical treatment fails. The main cause of cervical radiculopathy is degenerative disease of the spine, leading to foraminal stenosis and ultimately a nerve-root impingement. Often patients ask about the heredity of their condition, but no clear answers can be given. The controversy is in the choice of operative treatment, conducting either Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (ACDF) or Posterior Foraminotomy (PF). Both methods have been around since the late 1950’s but despite this, evidence is still lacking to confirm superiority of either method. The objective of this thesis is to ascertain the outcomes of ACDF and PF as well as the hereditary factors for requiring surgery. We used the Swespine registry to ascertain the clinical outcomes of surgery for CR, subsequently, by using pseudo-randomization we evaluated the patient reported outcomes and reoperation rates between ACDF and PF. Our results revealed that both methods have equal clinical outcomes at 1,2- and 5-years of follow-up. We showed higher reoperation rate for PF than ACDF at index level. Subsequently, we could move forward in creating a multicentre randomized controlled trial with ACDF as control, and PF as intervention with a non-inferiority design. A study protocol was designed using the reporting guidelines for clinical trials and published. Thus, Örebro Multicentre Study on Operative Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Versus Posterior Foraminotomy (OMSAP) was born and the study started in 2020. Interim analysis after 5-years of recruiting concludes higher reoperation rates for PF and statistically non-significant outcomes in favour of ACDF, no severe adverse events have been found in the analysis. Finally, we used the Swespine registry and the Twin registry to ascertain the hereditary factors for the surgical phenotype by examining the operation rates in 145 twins for cervical degenerative diseases. We conclude that the probability for hereditary factor for surgically treated diseases is low.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2025. p. 96
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 323
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-119861 (URN)9789175296555 (ISBN)9789175296562 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-05-23, Örebro universitet, Campus USÖ, hörsal X1, Södra Grev Rosengatan 32, Örebro, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-03-13 Created: 2025-03-13 Last updated: 2025-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Holy, MarekSigmundsson, Freyr Gauti

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holy, MarekSigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Trials
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 239 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf