To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2090-4563
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Surgery.
2022 (English)In: Hernia, ISSN 1265-4906, E-ISSN 1248-9204, Vol. 26, no 2, p. 635-646Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel IPOM procedure with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, and to compare the outcomes of this procedure with IPOM with- (IPOM-plus) and IPOM without (sIPOM) defect closure.

Method: A single-centre retrospective study comparing a novel IPOM technique with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) with the two commonly used IPOM techniques, IPOM with defect closure (IPOM-plus) and without defect closure (sIPOM). The intraoperative and postoperative data of patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM ventral hernia repair were reviewed. Preoperative data, recurrence, and postoperative seroma, surgical site infection, and pain, were compared.

Results: From January 2017 to June 2020, a total of 213 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with IPOM technique. The mean length and width of the ventral hernia was 4.4 +/- 1.8 cm and 3.6 +/- 1.4 cm, respectively, and the mean BMI was 30.1 +/- 5.2 kg/m(2). The mean operating time was 67 +/- 28 min and was longer for IPOM-pb (71 +/- 27 min), less for IPOM-plus (63 +/- 28 min), and least for sIPOM (61 +/- 26 min). The incidence of early postoperative seroma was least in IPOM-pb (1/98, 1%), and similar in the IPOM-plus (4/94, 4%) and sIPOM (1/21, 5%) group. Late postoperative seroma was found only in IPOM-plus (2, 2%). The incidence of early and late postoperative pain was relatively higher in sIPOM (3, 14%; 1, 5%, respectively) compared to IPOM-pb and IPOM-plus in the early (5, 5% and 6, 6%) and late (2, 2% and 1, 1%) postoperative period, respectively. Surgical site infection was higher in sIPOM group (3, 14%), compared to IPOM-pb (1, 1%), and IPOM-plus (3, 3%). Recurrence rates were similar in IPOM-pb group (3/98, 3%) and IPOM-plus (3/94, 3%), and none in sIPOM (0/21).

Conclusion: IPOM with peritoneal bridging is as feasible and safe as conventional IPOM with defect closure and simple non-defect closure. However, a large randomised controlled trial is required to confirm this finding.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2022. Vol. 26, no 2, p. 635-646
Keywords [en]
Laparoscopic surgery, Ventral hernia, IPOM, Peritoneal bridging, Defect closure
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-94884DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9ISI: 000698877800001PubMedID: 34559335Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85115622527OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-94884DiVA, id: diva2:1602755
Note

Funding agency:

Örebro University

Available from: 2021-10-13 Created: 2021-10-13 Last updated: 2025-04-02Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Advancements in technology and medicine have rendered laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) more favourable than open ventral hernia repair (OVHR). Albeit associated with risk of postoperative seroma, LVHR may reduce wound infection rates and hospital stays. However, LVHR requires accurate technique and careful patient selection.

Study I was a retrospective study conducted at the Karlskoga Hospital Hernia Centre. From January 2017 to June 2020, 876 ventral hernia operations were performed. We analysed 213 patients who underwent ventral hernia repair with Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh without defect closure (sIPOM), IPOM with defect closure (IPOM-P), and IPOM with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) and compared the incidence of postoperative seroma, discomfort, recurrence, and complications.

Study II was a randomized controlled trial with 112 participants who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair between November 2018 and December 2020. The participants underwent ultrasonography at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative seroma, discomfort, and complications following IPOMpb and sIPOM were analysed.

Study III was a registry-based study of the impact of COVID-19 on emergency and planned hernia repair procedures, divided into two periods; the pre non COVID-19 Period Januari 2016 - December 2019 as a control group and the COVID-19 Period Januari 2020 to December 2021 as the study group.

Study IV was a population-register study based on a retrospective cohort evaluating risk factors for postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting in 4795 patients who underwent ventral hernia repair between 2016 and 2021, with 2409 of them undergoing open ventral hernia repair surgery. Data were assembled from the Swedish ventral hernia register and Swedish perioperative register.

Study I showed that the IPOM-pb approach was as safe and feasible as conventional IPOM, requiring no additional effort from the surgeon or staff.

Study II showed lower incidence of postoperative seroma and discomfort in IPOM with peritoneal bridging in early-stage follow-ups, with no significant difference in subsequent follow-ups.

In study III the pandemic planned surgeries were impacted but the result in this study showed that there was no increase in emergency hernia operations due to delayed planned surgery. Careful observation and caution are crucial during a pandemic.

Study IV showed that postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting are more common in women, emergency surgery, younger age patients, and those who had surgery with inhalation anesthesia compared to total intravenous anesthesia.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2025. p. 73
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 301
Keywords
Laparoscopic hernia surgery, Ventral hernia, IPOM
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-116581 (URN)9789175295909 (ISBN)9789175295916 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-03-28, Örebro universitet, Campus USÖ, Hörsal X1, Södra Grev Rosengatan 32, Örebro, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-10-08 Created: 2024-10-08 Last updated: 2025-04-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ali, FathallaWallin, Göran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ali, FathallaWallin, Göran
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Hernia
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 413 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf