To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
One additional educational session in inhaler use to patients with COPD in primary health care: A controlled clinical trial
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Region Värmland, Sweden.
Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Region Värmland, Sweden.
Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Region Värmland, Sweden; Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy & Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Patient Education and Counseling, ISSN 0738-3991, E-ISSN 1873-5134, Vol. 105, no 9, p. 2969-2975Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether one additional educational session about inhaler use, delivered to patients with COPD in primary healthcare, could affect the patients' skills in inhaler use. Specifically, to study the effects on errors related to handling the device, to inhalation technique, and to both.

METHODS: This nonrandomized controlled clinical trial included 64 patients who used devices and made errors. COPD nurses assessed inhaler use using a checklist and educated patients. Intervention group received one additional educational session after two weeks.

RESULTS: At baseline, patients in the IG had more devices (n = 2,1) compared to patients in the CG (n = 1,6) (p = 0.003). No other statistically significant differences were seen at baseline. At follow-up, intervention group showed a lower proportion of patients who made errors related to handling the device (p = 0.006). No differences were seen in the other categories.

CONCLUSION: One additional educational session in inhaler use for patients with COPD was effective in reducing the proportion of patients making errors related to handling of their devices.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Categorization of errors might help healthcare professionals to assess the suitability of patients' devices, tailor patient education, and thus improve patient health.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 105, no 9, p. 2969-2975
Keywords [en]
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Device, Inhalation technique, Inhaler use, Patient education
National Category
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-99553DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.013ISI: 000863225900019PubMedID: 35672192Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85131505862OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-99553DiVA, id: diva2:1670259
Funder
Region Värmland, LIVFOU-927791 LIVFOU-939697Available from: 2022-06-15 Created: 2022-06-15 Last updated: 2026-05-04Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Optimization of inhaler use in patients with COPD
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Optimization of inhaler use in patients with COPD
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Overall aim: The overall aim was to investigate and optimize inhaler use and patient education in COPD in primary health care.

Methods: Study I was an observational study assessing patients’ inhaler use. Study II was a non-randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of an additional inhaler education session. Study III was a register-based study identifying factors associated with patient education. Study IV was a qualitative focus group study exploring asthma/COPD nurses’ experiences of inhaler education.

Results: In Study I, 45% of the 183 patients made at least one inhaler error; 50% made errors related to device handling, 31% made errors relating to inhalation technique, and 19% made both types of error. In Study II, the education group showed a significant improvement in device-handling errors, after one revisit. Study III revealed that only 44% of patients with COPD had received patient education, primarily those with more severe disease. In Study IV, asthma/COPD nurses described inhalation treatment as challenging, and reported deficiencies particularly in continuing education, limited managerial support, and insufficient time for patient care.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrate a high prevalence of incorrect inhaler use among patients with COPD. Categorizing errors into device-handling and inhalation-technique errors may simplify assessment and facilitate more individualized, patient-centered education. Health care organizations should prioritize COPD and support asthma/COPD nurses through education, collaboration, and adequate time for patient care. Patient education, including inhaler training, should be initiated earlier and offered to more patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2026. p. 100
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 355
Keywords
Inhaler errors, Inhaler use, Nursing care, Patient education, Primary health care, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-127339 (URN)9789175297736 (ISBN)9789175297743 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-06-05, Värmlands museum, Hörsalen, Sandgrundsudden, Karlstad, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-02-17 Created: 2026-02-17 Last updated: 2026-05-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindh, AnnikaWesterdahl, ElisabethZakrisson, Ann-Britt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindh, AnnikaWesterdahl, ElisabethZakrisson, Ann-Britt
By organisation
School of Health SciencesSchool of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Patient Education and Counseling
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 205 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf