To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Antibiotic prescription in bone augmentation and dental implant procedures: a multi-center study
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Head-neck and plastic surgery clinic, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Dental Medicine, Division of Orofacial Diagnostics and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Dental Medicine, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jönköping, Sweden.
Department of Dentistry, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Biomaterials, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: BMC Oral Health, E-ISSN 1472-6831, Vol. 23, no 1, article id 818Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Adherence to antibiotic recommendations and safety aspects of restrictive use are important components when combating antibiotic resistance. The primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of national guidelines on antibiotic prescriptions for bone augmentation procedures among dentists working at three specialized clinics. The secondary aim was to assess the occurrence of postoperative infections.

METHODS: Medical charts of 400 patients treated with bone augmentation were reviewed: 200 in the years 2010-2011 and 200 in 2014-2015. The Swedish national recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis were published in 2012.

RESULTS: There was a wide variation in antibiotic regiments prescribed throughout the study. The number of patients treated with antibiotic prophylaxis in a single dose of 2 g amoxicillin, and treated as advocated in the national recommendations, was low and decreasing between the two time periods from 25% (n = 50/200) in 2010-2011 to 18.5% (n = 37/200) in 2014-2015. The number of patients not given any antibiotics either as a prophylactic single dose or during the postoperative phase increased (P < 0.001). The administration of a 3-7-days antibiotic prescription increased significantly from 25.5% in 2010-2011 to 35% in 2014-2015. The postoperative infection rates (4.5% and 6.5%) were without difference between the studied periods. Smoking and omitted antibiotic prophylaxis significantly increased the risk of postoperative infection. Logistic regression analyses showed that patient male gender and suffering from a disease were predictive factors for the clinician to adhere to the guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS: After introduction of national recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis before bone augmentation procedures, the patient group receiving a single preoperative dose decreased while the group not given antibiotic prophylaxis increased. There was no difference in occurrence of postoperative infections between the two time periods. The results indicate a need for educational efforts and strategies for implementation of antibiotic prudence and awareness among surgeons performing bone augmentation procedures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2023. Vol. 23, no 1, article id 818
Keywords [en]
Antibiotic prophylaxis, Bone augmentation, Dental implant insertion, Guidelines, Infection
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-109501DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03534-6ISI: 001139086500002PubMedID: 37899438Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85175198145OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-109501DiVA, id: diva2:1808725
Funder
Karolinska InstituteStockholm County CouncilRegion Västra GötalandUniversity of Gothenburg
Note

Funding Agencies:

Steering Group for Collaborative Odontology Research at Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, TUA grant Public Dental Service, Region Västra Götaland and GU Biomaterials, Gothenburg University, Sweden. Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute.

Available from: 2023-11-01 Created: 2023-11-01 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Publisher's fulltext(1086 kB)49 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1086 kBChecksum SHA-512
d5f5d2c25bbb22dd831bd035aa9250b5bad4a65f1ef57c72aff90acb78827c71ccb85541b003f5fc1432082a12169d3654295607af08b5b510bb5e865a4e846e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bazsefidpay, Nikoo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bazsefidpay, Nikoo
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Oral Health
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 49 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 292 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf