Long-term follow-up on patient attitudes towards renewed ECT: A register-based cohort study
2024 (English) In: Journal of Psychiatric Research, ISSN 0022-3956, E-ISSN 1879-1379, Vol. 177, p. 24-30Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a safe and effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). After receiving ECT for MDD there is a large risk of relapse within the first year. Patient attitudes towards renewed treatment could impact their decisions regarding future therapy. We conducted a nationwide cohort study, using data from Swedish registers. Patients with MDD who received ECT were followed up to six months after the initial ECT-series. We investigated if certain patient and treatment characteristics during the initial treatment were correlated to their attitude towards renewed ECT at the six-month follow-up. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for predictors. The Bonferroni method was used to adjust significance levels for multiple testing. The study included 1917 patients. 51.1% of patients were positive, 27.6% were undecided and 21.3% were negative towards renewed treatment. Patients with response to treatment were less likely to have a negative attitude towards renewed ECT (odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.41, P < 0.001). Moreover, patients with experience of ECT prior to the index series were less likely to have a negative attitude towards renewed ECT (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.34-0.58, P < 0.001). In order to minimize the risk of negative attitudes towards renewed ECT for MDD, treatment should primarily be reserved for patients that are likely to respond to ECT.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 177, p. 24-30
Keywords [en]
Electroconvulsive therapy, Major depressive disorder, Patient Preference, Patient satisfaction, Patient-Centered care
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-114658 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.06.040 ISI: 001266717800001 PubMedID: 38971053 Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85197205615 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-114658 DiVA, id: diva2:1882826
Funder Stiftelsen Söderström - Königska sjukhemmet Swedish Psychiatric Foundation Fredrik och Ingrid Thurings Stiftelse Region Stockholm
Note his study was supported by The Söderstrom-König foundation. Alexander Kronsell has received Funding from Stiftelsen Professor Bror Gadelius Minnesfond, Fonden for psykisk hälsa and Fredrik och Ingrid Thurings Stiftelse. Mikael Tiger was supported by Region Stockholm (clinical research appointment).
2024-07-082024-07-082024-07-29 Bibliographically approved