To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Size homeostasis can be intrinsic to growing cell populations and explained without size sensing or signalling
Theoretical Biophysics Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Theoretical Biophysics Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Theoretical Biophysics Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Theoretical Biophysics Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7843-8342
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: The FEBS Journal, ISSN 1742-464X, E-ISSN 1742-4658, Vol. 279, no 22, p. 4213-4230Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The cell division cycle orchestrates cellular growth and division. The machinery underpinning the cell division cycle is well characterized, but the actual cue(s) driving the cell division cycle remains unknown. In rapidly growing and dividing yeast cells, this cue has been proposed to be cell size. Presumably, a mechanism communicating cell size acts as gatekeeper for the cell division cycle via the G(1) network, which triggers G(1) exit only when a critical size has been reached. Here, we evaluate this hypothesis with a minimal core model linking metabolism, growth and the cell division cycle. Using this model, we (a) present support for coordinated regulation of G(1)/S and G(2)/M transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to altered growth conditions, (b) illustrate the intrinsic antagonism between G(1) progression and cell size and (c) provide evidence that the coupling of growth and division is sufficient to allow for size homeostasis without directly communicating or measuring cell size. We show that even with a rudimentary version of the G(1) network consisting of a single unregulated cyclin, size homeostasis is maintained in populations during autocatalytic growth when the geometric constraint on nutrient supply is considered. Taken together, our results support the notion that cell size is a consequence rather than a regulator of growth and division. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2012. Vol. 279, no 22, p. 4213-4230
National Category
Cell and Molecular Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-116607DOI: 10.1111/febs.12014ISI: 000310548000009PubMedID: 23013467Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84868208262OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-116607DiVA, id: diva2:1904434
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 201142German Research Foundation (DFG), IRTG 1360German Research Foundation (DFG), CRC 618Available from: 2024-10-09 Created: 2024-10-09 Last updated: 2025-01-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Krantz, Marcus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Krantz, Marcus
In the same journal
The FEBS Journal
Cell and Molecular Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf