Moderators and predictors of treatment outcome following adjunctive internet-delivered emotion regulation therapy relative to treatment as usual alone for adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury disorder: Randomized controlled trialShow others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: JCPP Advances, E-ISSN 2692-9384, Vol. 4, no 3, article id e12243Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BACKGROUND: Despite the wide-ranging negative consequences of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), there are few evidence-based treatments for NSSI among adolescents and little is known about what treatments that work best for whom. The objective of this study was to investigate moderators (i.e., for whom a specific treatment works) and predictors (i.e., factors associated with treatment outcome independent of treatment type) of treatment outcome in a randomized clinical trial comparing internet-delivered emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (IERITA) plus treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone.
METHODS: Adolescents (N = 166; mean [SD] age = 15.0 [1.2] years) with NSSI disorder were randomized to IERITA plus TAU (n = 84) or TAU-only (n = 82). Adolescent emotion regulation difficulties, suicidality, NSSI frequency, depressive symptoms, sleep difficulties, global functioning, and age, and parental invalidation, were measured pre-treatment and investigated as moderators and predictors of treatment outcome (i.e., NSSI frequency during treatment and for 4 weeks post-treatment). A zero-inflated negative binomial generalized linear mixed effects regression model was used to estimate the rate of NSSI change as a function of both treatment condition and moderator/predictor.
RESULTS: No significant moderators of treatment outcome were found. Parental invalidation was a significant predictor of treatment outcome regardless of treatment condition, such that high levels of parental invalidation pre-treatment were associated with a less favorable NSSI frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence of a differential treatment effect as a function of any of the examined client factors. Future research should investigate moderation in larger samples and with sufficient statistical power to detect moderation effects of smaller magnitude. Results suggest that parental invalidation may have a negative impact on treatment response and highlight the importance of further investigating parental invalidation in the context of NSSI treatments.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2024. Vol. 4, no 3, article id e12243
Keywords [en]
Emotion regulation, internet‐delivered therapy, moderator, nonsuicidal self‐injury, self‐injurious behaviors
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-116875DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12243ISI: 001336635900010PubMedID: 39411472OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-116875DiVA, id: diva2:1906630
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017–01506Marcus and Amalia Wallenberg Foundation, MAW 2014.0021Fredrik och Ingrid Thurings StiftelseClas Groschinski Memorial Foundation, SF18121Sven Jerring FoundationKempe-Carlgrenska FoundationStiftelsen Professor Bror Gadelius MinnesfondKnut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, KAW 2018.0426The Royal Swedish Academy of Letters, History and Antiquities (KVHAA)
Note
Funding: This study was supported by the National Self Injury Project in Sweden, grant 2014–1008 and grant 2017–01506 from the Swedish Research Council, grant MAW 2014.0021 from the Markus and Amelia Wallenberg Foundation, Fredrik och Ingrid Thurings Foundation, grant SF18121 from the L. J., Clas Groschinskys Foundation, the Sven Jerring Foundation, the Kempe-Carlgrenska Foundation, and Bror Gadelius Foundation. Johan Bjureberg was supported by grant KAW 2018.0426 from the Knut och Alice Wallenberg's Foundation, The Royal Swedish Academy of Letters, History and Antiquities and Stiftelsen Natur & Kultur.
2024-10-182024-10-182024-11-01Bibliographically approved