To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Core set of patient-reported outcome measures to measure quality of life in obesity treatment research
Department of Surgery, OLVG & Dutch Obesity Clinic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Science, Nederlandse Obesitas Kliniek (Dutch Obesity Clinic), Huis Ter Heide, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Obesity Reviews, ISSN 1467-7881, E-ISSN 1467-789X, Vol. 26, no 2, article id e13849Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The lack of standardization in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has made measurement and comparison of quality of life (QoL) outcomes in research focused on obesity treatment challenging. This study reports on the results of the second and third global multidisciplinary Standardizing Quality of life measures in Obesity Treatment (S.Q.O.T.) consensus meetings, where a core set of PROMs to measure nine previously selected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in obesity treatment research was established. The S.Q.O.T. II online and S.Q.O.T. III face-to-face hybrid consensus meetings were held in October 2021 and May 2022. The meetings were led by an independent moderator specializing in PRO measurement. Nominal group techniques, Delphi exercises, and anonymous voting were used to select the most suitable PROMs by consensus. The meetings were attended by 28 and 27 participants, respectively, including a geographically diverse selection of people living with obesity (PLWO) and experts from various disciplines. Out of 24 PROs and 16 PROMs identified in the first S.Q.O.T. consensus meeting, the following nine PROs and three PROMs were selected via consensus: BODY-Q (physical function, physical symptoms, psychological function, social function, eating behavior, and body image), IWQOL-Lite (self-esteem), and QOLOS (excess skin). No PROM was selected to measure stigma as existing PROMs deemed to be inadequate. A core set of PROMs to measure QoL in research focused on obesity treatment has been selected incorporating patients' and experts' opinions. This core set should serve as a minimum to use in obesity research studies and can be combined with clinical parameters.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2025. Vol. 26, no 2, article id e13849
Keywords [en]
Bariatric surgery, obesity treatment, patient‐reported outcome, quality of life
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117014DOI: 10.1111/obr.13849ISI: 001333965700001PubMedID: 39419653Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85206836706OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-117014DiVA, id: diva2:1908121
Available from: 2024-10-24 Created: 2024-10-24 Last updated: 2026-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ottosson, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ottosson, Johan
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Obesity Reviews
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf