To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Need for Standardization of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Performance Evaluation: An Opinion by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Scientific Division, The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Milano, Italy; Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Scientific Division, The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Milano, Italy; Equalis AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Scientific Division, The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Milano, Italy; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, E-ISSN 1932-2968, article id 19322968241296097Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Metrics derived from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are often discordant between systems. A major cause is that CGM systems are not standardized; they use various algorithms and calibration methods, leading to discordant CGM readings across systems. This discordance can be addressed by standardizing CGM performance assessments: If manufacturers aim their CGM systems at the same target, then CGM readings will align across systems. This standardization should include the comparator device, sample origin, and study procedures. With better aligned CGM readings, CGM-derived metrics will subsequently also align better between systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Diabetes Technology Society , 2024. article id 19322968241296097
Keywords [en]
IFCC, continuous glucose monitoring, standardization
National Category
Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117360DOI: 10.1177/19322968241296097ISI: 001355575000001PubMedID: 39540398Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85208928538OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-117360DiVA, id: diva2:1914008
Note

Funding:

Financial support was provided by Diabetes Center Berne.

Available from: 2024-11-18 Created: 2024-11-18 Last updated: 2025-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Jendle, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jendle, Johan
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Endocrinology and Diabetes

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf