To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of the Assessment of Rehabilitation Needs Checklist in a Swedish cancer population
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4475-0650
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. University Health Care Research Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2655-3573
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. University Health Care Research Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6703-7575
Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Regional Oncological Centre Uppsala-Örebro, Uppsala, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, E-ISSN 2509-8020, Vol. 8, no 1, article id 142Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Assessment of Rehabilitation Needs Checklist (ARNC), has been developed to assess rehabilitation need in cancer patients and is recommended by the Confederation of Regional Cancer Centres in Sweden, known as Hälsoskattningen. The aim of the study was to test the reliability and validity of the ARNC, mainly by comparing it with the Distress thermometer and EORTC QLQ-C30.

METHODOLOGY: A sample of 993 persons identified in the Swedish cancer register. The study participants were diagnosed with cancer in 2021 in the Mid Sweden region. The psychometric methods tested reliability and validity including factor analysis.

RESULTS: The response rate was 38%. The test-retest analysis showed that ICC was 0.80 or higher for 12 of the ARNC items. A strong or modarete correlation between ARNC and the other instruments was found in all functional scales and for most items. CFA of the 13-item two-factor model showed a RMSEA value of 0.04, CFI and TLI values of 0.97 and 0.96, and a SRMR value of 0.05, indicating a satisfactory model fit.

CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the ARNC suggests that it is an acceptable and reliable screening instrument for detecting symptoms and signs indicating a possible need of rehabilitation. The medium to strong correlations between ARNC items and the EORTC QLQ- C30 items and scales suggest that ARNC could be an alternative also for research purposes when a shorter and less comprehensive instrument is needed. The simple design could be an advantage as it lowers the burden on cancer patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2024. Vol. 8, no 1, article id 142
Keywords [en]
Cancer rehabilitation, Checklist, Hälsoskattning, Survey, Validation
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117649DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00818-5ISI: 001370649500001PubMedID: 39638928Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85211121290OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-117649DiVA, id: diva2:1919529
Funder
Örebro UniversityRegion Örebro CountyAvailable from: 2024-12-09 Created: 2024-12-09 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ohlsson-Nevo, EmmaFogelkvist, MariaLundqvist, Lars-OlovKarlsson, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ohlsson-Nevo, EmmaFogelkvist, MariaLundqvist, Lars-OlovKarlsson, Jan
By organisation
School of Health SciencesÖrebro University HospitalSchool of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf