To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Kidney stone analysis: an EAU section of urolithiasis (EULIS) survey on current practices and perspectives worldwide
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Department of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.
Department of Urology, Santo António University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: World journal of urology, ISSN 0724-4983, E-ISSN 1433-8726, Vol. 43, no 1, article id 21Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To investigate the current thoughts and perspectives on kidney stone analysis amongst urologists and urology residents worldwide.

METHODS: In October 2022 an online survey supported by the EULIS was circulated amongst urologists and urology residents worldwide. The survey was based on the current EAU guidelines regarding stone analysis and its role in urolithiasis management. Responses were collected until February 2023.

RESULTS: The survey was completed by 351 urologists (75.4%) and 115 urology residents (24.7%). 49.1% of the participants stated that performing kidney stone analysis was of utmost importance in every patient. 91.8% were of the opinion that stone analysis changes KSD management. 62.3% of the participants declared to adhere to the guidelines. 44.7% aim to perform stone analysis in first-time stone formers. 1 out of 11 does not send stones for kidney stone analysis at all. Urologists that pursued an additional endo-urology sub-specialism performed stone analysis more frequently compared to those who were not endo-urologists.

CONCLUSION: Although majority of urologists consider stone analysis an essential part of kidney stone management, in reality the practice patterns regarding stone analysis deviate from the EAU guidelines. Our aim should be to bridge the knowledge gap regarding stone analysis, foster collaboration to streamline logistics regarding stone analysis and enhance the quality of care we provide for kidney stone patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2024. Vol. 43, no 1, article id 21
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117743DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05348-9ISI: 001375541800001PubMedID: 39656283Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85211325269OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-117743DiVA, id: diva2:1920383
Available from: 2024-12-11 Created: 2024-12-11 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Popiolek, Marcin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Popiolek, Marcin
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
World journal of urology
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf