To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Surgical Recovery Through the Lens of Patients with Colorectal Disease: A Qualitative Study in an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Setting
School of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Patient partner, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Departments of Oncology and of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cumming School of Medicine; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, ISSN 1072-7515, E-ISSN 1879-1190, Vol. 240, no 1, p. 11-23Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: As perioperative care shifts to a more patient-centered model, understanding needs and experiences of patients is vital. Gaining such insight can enhance the alignment of care with patient priorities, encouraging adherence to recovery-oriented interventions. We aimed to explore patient-defined recovery and the elements that modify the recovery process for patients with colorectal disease under Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care.

STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative study was conducted at an ERAS-participating hospital in Alberta, Canada, between April 2018 to June 2019. A co-design focus group set the research direction and semi-structured interviews were conducted postoperatively in hospital or within 3 months post-discharge. Diverse patient ages and colorectal conditions were targeted through purposive sampling. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through manifest and latent content analysis.

RESULTS: Twenty patients with mean age 62 (SD:13) years and 45% with cancer (n=17 interview, n=2 focus group and interview, n=1 focus group only) were enrolled. Recovery was defined by patients as the return to normal routines and four themes were identified. First, Phases of recovery: recovery was described as multidimensional phases distinctively as early, late/long-term, and the endpoint. Second, Recovery facilitators: recovery was supported through positive mindsets, conscious recovery, and taking an active role. Third, Recovery barriers: recovery was hindered by negative mindsets and treatment side-effects. Finally, Recovery catalysts: communication, autonomy, and expectations facilitated active or passive recovery.

CONCLUSION: Our patient-oriented recovery model may contribute a new dimension to the ERAS framework by capturing patients' recovery experiences. Further research is encouraged to explore its value in enhancing patient-centered care within ERAS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2025. Vol. 240, no 1, p. 11-23
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117023DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001218ISI: 001378875700007PubMedID: 39431618Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85212991103OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-117023DiVA, id: diva2:1922401
Available from: 2024-12-18 Created: 2024-12-18 Last updated: 2025-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ljungqvist, Olle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungqvist, Olle
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 32 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf