Non-pharmacological treatment strategies for anthropometric, physical capacity and physiological indicators among sarcopenic obesity patients: a systematic review of rigorous randomized controlled trialsShow others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Age and Ageing, ISSN 0002-0729, E-ISSN 1468-2834, Vol. 53, no 12, article id afae278Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of non-pharmacological treatments on sarcopenic obesity (SO).
METHODS: A search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SO was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models for MDs.
RESULTS: The meta-analysis on 21 RCTs showed that exercise improved PBF (MD: -1.67%, p < .01, I2 = 35%), grip strength (MD: 2.2 kg, p = .03, I2 = 61%), GS (MD: 0.08 m/s, p = .02, I2 = 0%), TCR (MD: 2.22 repetitions, p < .01, I2 = 0%), TUG (MD: -1.48 s, p < .01, I2 = 61%), UE strength (MD: 1.88 kg/kg, p < .01, I2 = 0%) and LE strength (MD: 2.19 kg/kg, p < .01, I2 = 0%). Nutritional interventions improved grip strength (MD: 1.52 kg, p < .01, I2 = 0%). Combine interventions improved PBF (MD: -1.97%, p < .01, I2 = 38%), ASMM (MD: 0.4 kg, p < .01, I2 = 6%), grip strength (MD: 1.83 kg, p < .01, I2 = 38%) and GS (MD: 0.04 m/s, p < .01, I2 = 0%). Combined interventions were more effective than nutrition alone for reducing PBF (MD: -0.8%, p = .05, I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSION: The effects of exercise and nutrition interventions on SO are limited individually, especially regarding muscle mass, but their combination can yield optimal results. Additionally, physical therapy also demonstrated some potential.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2024. Vol. 53, no 12, article id afae278
Keywords [en]
Anthropometric indicators, non-pharmacological treatment, older people, physical capacity, physiology indicators, sarcopenic obesity, systematic review
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117941DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae278ISI: 001381847400001PubMedID: 39709591Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85213402960OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-117941DiVA, id: diva2:1923371
Note
Funding:
This study was supported by National Social Science Fund of China (21BTY092) and Chongqing Doctoral Research Innovation Project (CYB240087).
2024-12-232024-12-232025-02-11Bibliographically approved