To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical validation and experiences of the microfluidics sperm selection device ZyMōt™ for standard IVF
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7954-0696
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
2025 (English)In: JBRA assisted reproduction, ISSN 1517-5693, Vol. 29, no 2, p. 244-250Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: Clinical validation of sperm selection device ZyMōt™ for standard IVF.

METHODS: The pre-clinical validation of ZyMōt™ included several steps. First, split semen preparation compared density gradient centrifugation (DGC) to ZyMōt™ with primary outcome fraction and absolute number of progressive motile sperm. Second, sibling oocytes were fertilized with sperms prepared with DGC and sperms selected by ZyMōt™, primary endpoint fertilization rate, utility rate, embryo development pace quality. After this, DGC was replaced by ZyMōt™, first without centrifugation steps, and then with a five-minute centrifugation step and subsequent media change prior to gamete co-incubation. Endpoint was assessment of key performance indicators against previous results using DGC for standard IVF.

RESULTS: ZyMōt™ resulted in purer sperm selection compared to DGC (fraction progressive motile sperm 97.2±3.1% vs. 83.0±14.1%, p<0.01). Fertilization of sibling oocytes resulted in similar fertilization rates and utility rates, and no differences in embryo development pace or quality. However, after changing sperm selection protocol from DGC to ZyMōt™ for standard IVF for all fresh semen samples with motile sperm, the fertilization rates and utility rates were significantly reduced, and cases of total failure of fertilization increased substantially. Adding five-minute centrifugation and media change after centrifugation to the sperm selection protocol restored fertilization rate, including total failure of fertilization rate, to normal.

CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, the ZyMōt™ sperm selection device is suitable for standard IVF only after inclusion of five minutes centrifugation and subsequent media change prior to gamete co-incubation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Villimpress , 2025. Vol. 29, no 2, p. 244-250
Keywords [en]
Clinical validation, density gradient centrifugation, in vitro fertilization, microfluidics, sperm selection, sperm selection device
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-118158DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240104ISI: 001511696600005PubMedID: 39723883Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105007672349OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-118158DiVA, id: diva2:1925702
Available from: 2025-01-09 Created: 2025-01-09 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Adolfsson, Emma

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Adolfsson, Emma
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf