To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Enhancing individual glomerular filtration rate assessment: can we trust the equation? Development and validation of machine learning models to assess the trustworthiness of estimated GFR compared to measured GFR
Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Néphrologie, Caen, France; Normandie Université, Unicaen, UFR de Médecine, 2 Rue Des Rochambelles, Caen, France; ANTICIPE" U1086 INSERM-UCN, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Skane University Hospital, Clinical Studies Sweden Forum South, Remissgatan 4, Lund, 22185, Sweden; Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Campus Kulak, Kortrijk, Belgium; Itec, Imec Research Group, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Campus Kulak, Kortrijk, Belgium; Itec, Imec Research Group, KU Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: BMC Nephrology, E-ISSN 1471-2369, Vol. 26, no 1, article id 47Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations are widely used in clinical practice but exhibit inherent limitations. On the other side, measuring GFR is time consuming and not available in routine clinical practice. We developed and validated machine learning models to assess the trustworthiness (i.e. the ability of equations to estimate measured GFR (mGFR) within 10%, 20% or 30%) of the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation at the individual level.

METHODS: This observational study used data from European and US cohorts, comprising 22,343 participants of all ages with available mGFR results. Four machine learning and two traditional logistic regression models were trained on a cohort of 9,202 participants to predict the likelihood of the EKFC creatinine-derived eGFR falling within 30% (p30), 20% (p20) or 10% (p10) of the mGFR value. The algorithms were internally and then externally validated on cohorts of respectively 3,034 and 10,107 participants. The predictors included in the models were creatinine, age, sex, height, weight, and EKFC.

RESULTS: The random forest model was the most robust model. In the external validation cohort, the model achieved an area under the curve of 0.675 (95%CI 0.660;0.690) and an accuracy of 0.716 (95%CI 0.707;0.725) for the P30 criterion. Sensitivity was 0.756 (95%CI 0.747;0.765) and specificity was 0.485 (95%CI 0.460; 0.511) at the 80% probability level that EKFC falls within 30% of mGFR. At the population level, the PPV of this machine learning model was 89.5%, higher than the EKFC P30 of 85.2%. A free web-application was developed to allow the physician to assess the trustworthiness of EKFC at the individual level.

CONCLUSIONS: A strategy using machine learning model marginally improves the trustworthiness of GFR estimation at the population level. An additional value of this approach lies in its ability to provide assessments at the individual level.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2025. Vol. 26, no 1, article id 47
Keywords [en]
Chronic kidney disease, Creatinine, Glomerular filtration rate, Machine learning, Random forest
National Category
Medical Biostatistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-119000DOI: 10.1186/s12882-025-03972-0ISI: 001411288100001PubMedID: 39885391Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85217623809OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-119000DiVA, id: diva2:1933287
Available from: 2025-01-31 Created: 2025-01-31 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sundin, Per-Ola

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundin, Per-Ola
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
BMC Nephrology
Medical Biostatistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf